The impact of obesity on disease activity, damage accrual, inflammation markers and cardiovascular risk factors in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Correa Rodríguez, María; Pocovi-Gerardino, Gabriela; Callejas Rubio, José Luis; Rios Fernández, Raquel; Martin Armada, María; Cruz Caparrós, María Gracia; Ortego Centeno, Norberto; Rueda Medina, Blanca MaríaEditorial
Edizioni Minerva Medica
Materia
Obesity Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Cardiovascular Risk
Fecha
2020Referencia bibliográfica
Publisher version: Correa-Rodríguez M, Pocovi-Gerardino G, Callejas Rubio JL, Ríos Fernández R, Martín Amada M, Cruz Caparrós M, Ortego-Centeno N, Rueda-Medina B. The impact of obesity on disease activity, damage accrual, inflammation markers and cardiovascular risk factors in systemic lupus erythematosus. Panminerva Med. 2020 Jun;62(2):75-82. DOI: 10.23736/S0031-0808.19.03748-0
Resumen
Background: We aimed to evaluate the relationships between obesity metrics including Body Mass Index (BMI), waist to height ratio (WtHR) and fat mass percentage, and disease activity, damage accrual, inflammation markers and traditional cardiovascular risk factors in SLE patients.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on a sample of 275 patients (90.5% females; mean age 46.37±13.85 years). Disease activity was assessed with the SLE disease activity index (SLEDAI-2K), and disease-related organ damage was assessed using the SLICC/ACR damage index (SDI). Biochemical variables of lipids profile, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), homocysteine (Hcy), anti-dsDNA titers and complement components C3 and C4 serum levels were measured. Blood pressure and ankle-brachial index (ABI) were also calculated.
Results: Significant differences were observed between normal-weight, overweight and obese patients in SLEDAI (2.60±2.48 vs. 2.71±2.65 vs. 3.84±3.02; P=0.004), SDI (0.76±1.10 vs. 1.09±1.24 vs. 1.57±1.54; P=0.002), hsCRP (2.15±2.93 vs. 3.24±3.63 vs. 5.30±5.63 mg/dL; P<0.001), complement C3 level (99.92±24.45 vs. 111.38±27.41 vs. 123.16±28.96 mg/dL; P<0.001), triglycerides serum levels (85.99±41.68 vs. 102.35±50.88 vs. 129.12±61.59 mg/dL; P<0.001) and systolic blood pressure (112.28±16.35 vs. 124.25±17.94 vs. 132.78±16.71 mmHg; P=0.001) after adjusting for age and sex.
Conclusions: Patients with SLE who are obese have worse disease activity and damage accrual, higher levels of inflammation markers hs-CRP and C3 complement, increased triglycerides serum levels and systolic blood pressure levels in comparison with overweight or normal weight SLE patients, supporting that optimizing weight in SLE patients should be a potential target to improve SLE outcomes.





