Metabolic rate in sedentary adults, following different exercise training interventions: The FIT-AGEING randomized controlled trial
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Amaro Gahete, Francisco José; De-la-O, Alejandro; Jurado Fasoli, Lucas; Sánchez Delgado, Guillermo; Ruiz Ruiz, Jonatan; Castillo Aguayo, Manuel JoséEditorial
Elsevier
Materia
Concurrent training Metabolic flexibility Energy metabolism
Fecha
2020-11Referencia bibliográfica
Amaro-Gahete, F. J., Jurado-Fasoli, L., Sanchez-Delgado, G., Ruiz, J. R., & Castillo, M. J. (2020). Metabolic rate in sedentary adults, following different exercise training interventions: The FIT-AGEING randomized controlled trial. Clinical nutrition, 39(11), 3230-32400. 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.02.001
Patrocinador
Spanish Ministry of Education, FPU13/01393, FPU14/04172 and FPU15/03960; University of Granada Plan Propio de Investigación 2016, Plan Propio de Investigación 2018 and Plan Propio de Investigación 2019; Junta de Andalucía; European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), SOMM17/6107/UGR; Redes Temáticas de Investigación Cooperativa, SAMID RD16/0022; Fundación Alfonso Martín EscuderoResumen
Background & aims: This study compares the influence of different exercise training programs on basal metabolic rate (BMR) and fat oxidation, in basal conditions (BFox) and during exercise (MFO), in sedentary, middle-aged adults.
Methods: The study subjects of this 12 week-long, randomised controlled trial, were 71 middle-aged adults (age 53.5 ± 4.9 years; 52% women). Subjects were randomly assigned to one of the following groups: (1) no exercise, (2) concurrent training based on international physical activity recommendations (PAR group), (3) high intensity interval training (HIIT group), and (4) high intensity interval training plus whole-body electromyostimulation (HIIT + EMS group). Subject BMR, BFox and MFO were determined by indirect calorimetry before and after the intervention.
Results: The HIIT + EMS subjects showed significant increases in BFox following the intervention compared with the control group (all P = 0.043); no such differences were seen in the PAR and HIIT compared with the control group (all P ≥ 0.1). A significant increase in post-intervention MFO was noted for the HIIT and HIIT + EMS group compared to the non-exercise control group (P < 0.05); no such difference was seen in the PAR group compared to the control group (all P ≥ 0.05).
Conclusions: Twelve weeks of high intensity interval training plus whole-body electromyostimulation may increase the BFox and MFO of middle-aged sedentary adults. These findings have important clinical implications; a well-designed high-intensity interval training program plus whole-body electromyostimulation might be followed to help combat the appearance of chronic metabolic diseases characterized by metabolic inflexibility in middle-aged sedentary adults, though it will be necessary to determine how long the effects last.





