Self-regulation of driving behavior under the influence of cannabis: the role of driving complexity and driver vision
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Ortiz Peregrina, Sonia; Oviedo Trespalacios, Oscar; Ortiz Herrera, Carolina; González Anera, María Del RosarioMateria
Cannabis THC Driver self-regulation
Fecha
2021-10-04Referencia bibliográfica
Published version: Ortiz-Peregrina, S., Oviedo-Trespalacios, O., Ortiz, C., & Anera, R. G. (2021). Self-Regulation of Driving Behavior Under the Influence of Cannabis: The Role of Driving Complexity and Driver Vision. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 65(7), 1506-1524. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208211047799
Patrocinador
Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Spain) and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), FIS2017-85058-R; Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (Spain), FPU15/05571; Australian Research Council, DE200101079Resumen
Objective: This study analyzed the self-regulation behaviors of drivers under the influence of cannabis and its relationship with road complexity and some driver traits, including visual deterioration. Background: Cannabis is the illicit drug most often detected in drivers; its use results in significant negative effects in terms of visual function. Self-regulation behaviors involve the mechanisms used by drivers to maintain or reduce the risk resulting from different circumstances or the driving environment. Methods: Thirty-one young, occasional cannabis users were assessed both in a baseline session and after smoking cannabis. We evaluated the visual function (visual acuity and contrast sensitivity) and driver self-regulation variables of both longitudinal and lateral control as the speed adaptation and standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP). Results: Visual function was significantly impaired after cannabis use. Recreational cannabis use did not result in self-regulation, although some road features such as curved roads did determine self-regulation. Male participants adopted mean faster driving speeds with respect to the speed limit. Driver age also determined better lateral control with lower SDLPs. In addition, visual impairment resulting from cannabis use (contrast sensitivity) was linked with self-regulation by changes in longitudinal and lateral control. Conclusion: Contrast sensitivity could be a good indicator of individual visual status to help determine how drivers self-regulate their driving both in normal conditions and while under the influence of cannabis. Application: The findings provide new insights about driver self-regulation under cannabis effects and are useful for policy making and awareness campaigns.




