“Abort the government!” Alliances between diverse groups and collective action intentions as a response to threat evoked by abortion bans
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Potoczek, Anna; Bukowsky, Marcin; Estevan-Reina, Lucía; Gurbisz, Dominika; Stafiej, Anna; Lemus Martín, Soledad DeEditorial
Sage Publications Ltd.
Materia
Coalitions collective action Intergroup cooperation
Fecha
2025-10Referencia bibliográfica
Potoczek, A., Bukowski, M., Estevan-Reina, L., Gurbisz, D., Stafiej, A., & de Lemus, S. (2025). “Abort the government!” Alliances between diverse groups and collective action intentions as a response to threat evoked by abortion bans. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 28(7), 1437-1458. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302251328035
Patrocinador
National Science Centre (grant No. 2018/30/M/HS6/00298); MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 - ERDF/EU (PID2022.141182NB.I00)Resumen
Recent abortion restrictions in the US and Poland sparked widespread protests. This research
examined how personal threat influenced collective action intentions through alliances with men
and the LGBTIQ+ community (from women’s perspective), and alliances with women (from
men’s perspective). It focused on two representations of intergroup cooperation: recategorization
as one group and coalitions between distinct groups. In both countries, higher threat levels were
linked to greater collective action intentions. For women, this was mediated by coalitions with men in
Poland, but not in the US, while coalition with the LGBTIQ+ community mediated the relationship
in both countries. Recategorization as one group mobilized women only in Poland when involving
the LGBTIQ+ community. For men, coalitions with women mediated the link between threat and
collective action in both countries. The findings suggest that coalitions preserving distinct group
identities are more effective in advancing women’s rights than recategorization, especially when
involving advantaged allies.





