Effectiveness of a Pain Informed Movement Program in Individuals With Post-COVID-19 Condition: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Calvache Mateo, Andrés; Navas Otero, Alba; Raya Benítez, Julia; Martin Núñez, Javier; Heredia Ciuró, Alejandro; Ortiz Rubio, Araceli; Valenza, Marie CarmenEditorial
Elsevier
Materia
Catastrophization Kinesiophobia Pain management
Fecha
2025-11Referencia bibliográfica
Calvache-Mateo, A., Navas-Otero, A., Raya-Benítez, J., Martín-Núñez, J., Heredia-Ciuró, A., Ortiz-Rubio, A., & Valenza, M. C. (2025). Effectiveness of a Pain Informed Movement program in individuals with post-COVID-19 condition: A randomized controlled trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 106(11), 1636–1644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2025.05.008
Patrocinador
Spanish Ministry of Education (Grant nos. FPU: FPU 22/01543, FPU 21/ 00451, FPU 20/01670, FPU 19/02609)Resumen
Objective: To evaluate the early effect of the Pain Informed Movement (PIM) program in patients with post-COVID-19 condition experiencing
new-onset persistent pain.
Design: A single-blind, two-arm, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial.
Setting: Public health sciences faculty.
Participants: Fifty-seven patients (N=57) with post-COVID-19 condition were randomized into the PIM (n=27) and the control (usual care and
educational booklet) groups (n=30).
Interventions: Patients in the intervention group received an 8-week PIM program. Each week, participants attended 2 face-to-face sessions of
1 hour per week. The first session was group-based and focused on pain neuroscience education. The second session was individual and consisted
of functional exercises and relaxation techniques. Additionally, patients were required to perform these exercises and techniques at home twice a
week, recording their compliance and progress.
Main Outcome Measures: Measured outcomes include pain intensity and interference measured with the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), catastrophizing
assessed with the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), kinesiophobia measured with the Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale (TSK) and functionality assessed
using World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0). Participants were assessed at baseline and postintervention.
Results: The intervention group showed a significant reduction in all variables with respect to baseline values. In addition, the intervention group
showed significant differences with respect to the control group in pain intensity (MD=2.84§0.62; P<.001; Cohen’s d=.21), pain interference
(MD=3.10§0.70; P<.001; Cohen’s d=1.18), catastrophizing (MD=12.52§2.48; P<.001; Cohen’s d=1.34), kinesiophobia (MD=8.07§1.34;
P<.001; Cohen’s d=1.56) and functionality (MD=16.16§6.92; P= .039; Cohen’s d=0.62).
Conclusions: In conclusion, the PIM program appears to be an effective intervention for reduction of new-onset persistent pain and improvement
of functionality in patients with post-COVID-19 condition. This study underscores the importance of multidimensional and personalized
approaches to persistent pain management, although more research is needed to confirm its applicability in clinical practice.





