Assessment Tools and Psychosocial Consequences of Smartphone Addiction in Nursing Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Lazo-Caparros, María Dolores; Gómez-Urquiza, Jose Luis; González Díaz, Ana; Pérez-Conde, Inmaculada; Gómez-Torres, Piedad; Membrive-Jiménez, María JoséEditorial
MDPI
Materia
Smartphone addiction Nursing students Systematic review
Fecha
2025-10-20Referencia bibliográfica
Lazo-Caparrós, M.D.; Gómez-Urquiza, J.L.; González-Díaz, A.; Pérez-Conde, I.; Gómez-Torres, P.; Membrive-Jiménez, M.J. Assessment Tools and Psychosocial Consequences of Smartphone Addiction in Nursing Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Healthcare 2025, 13, 2639. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13202639
Resumen
Background/Objectives: Problematic smartphone use is common among nursing students
and has been linked to academic and psychosocial difficulties. This PROSPERO-registered
systematic review (CRD42024559668) identified the instruments used to assess smartphone
addiction in nursing students and, secondarily, pooled typical addiction levels using the
Smartphone Addiction Scale–Short Version (SAS-SV; 10–60) and examined psychosocial
correlates. Methods: Following PRISMA 2020, we searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of
Science, CINAHL and ScienceDirect from 1 January 2014 to 9 May 2024. Eligible studies
assessed problematic smartphone use in undergraduate nursing students with validated
instruments, while development-only studies and pandemic-specific contexts were excluded. Methodological quality was appraised using the JBI checklist, and a random-effects
meta-analysis was performed to estimate pooled scores and explore cross-study variability.
Results: Fifty-three studies met inclusion; eleven contributed to the SAS-SV meta-analysis
(N = 5586). The pooled mean score was 29.5 (95% CI 27.7–31.3), with very high heterogeneity (I2 = 98%). Sensitivity analyses yielded similar results, and no publication bias was
detected. Across studies, higher smartphone addiction was correlated with elevated stress
and anxiety, sleep disturbance, and poorer academic and clinical performance. Conclusions:
Nursing students’ SAS-SV scores cluster around ~29/60, with substantial between-study
variability. Higher addiction scores were consistently associated with stress, anxiety, poor
sleep, and reduced academic and clinical performance. However, interpretation is limited by the cross-sectional nature of the included studies and the very high heterogeneity
observed. Standardising measurement is essential, but equally important is developing targeted educational interventions to foster healthier smartphone habits in nursing education.
These results may guide nursing educators and institutions to design programs that foster
healthier digital habits and support students’ academic and clinical performance.





