Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorMárquez, Gonzalo
dc.contributor.authorCoutado-Sánchez, Etham
dc.contributor.authorVillaraviz-Ferro, Adrián
dc.contributor.authorMarcos-Frutos, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Ramos, Amador 
dc.contributor.authorColomer-Poveda, David
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-25T09:26:57Z
dc.date.available2025-11-25T09:26:57Z
dc.date.issued2025-10-23
dc.identifier.citationMárquez, G.; CoutadoSánchez, E.; Villaraviz-Ferro, A.; Marcos-Frutos, D.; García-Ramos, A.; Colomer-Poveda, D. Effects of Varying Antagonist Exercise Volume in UpperBody Supersets on Mechanical, Metabolic, and Perceptual Responses in Resistance-Trained Men. J. Funct. Morphol. Kinesiol. 2025, 10, 419. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk10040419es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/108290
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This study aimed to analyze the effects of varying antagonist volume in upperbody supersets on mechanical (lifting velocity), metabolic (blood lactate), and perceptual (perceived exertion) variables. Methods: A randomized crossover study was conducted in which 14 resistance-trained men performed three strength training conditions. In the control condition (CTR), participants performed four sets of bench press with 8 repetitions at their 12-repetition maximum load, whereas in the experimental conditions, a prone bench pull was performed immediately after the bench press using 33% (SS1) or 66% (SS2) of the individual’s maximum possible repetitions. Lifting velocity, lactate concentration, and perceived exertion were measured. Repeated-measures ANOVA or Friedman test was applied to compare conditions, with Bonferroni-corrected post hoc tests and effect sizes reported. Results: Despite a progressive decrease in mean set velocity (p < 0.001) and fastest set velocity across sets (p = 0.014) in the agonist exercise (i.e., bench press), these variables did not significantly differ between conditions. The only difference observed was a lower mean set velocity during the prone bench pull in the SS2 condition compared to the SS1 condition (p = 0.011). Perceived exertion also increased across sets (p < 0.001), with no differences between protocols. Blood lactate concentration, measured before the final set, was significantly higher in SS2 compared to CTR (p = 0.003) and SS1 (p < 0.001), indicating a greater metabolic load during training. Conclusions: Agonist–antagonist supersets allow for reduced training time without negatively impacting acute mechanical performance in the agonist exercise. Low-fatigue configurations (SS1) in the secondary exercise do not significantly increase lactate levels, while moderate-fatigue configurations (SS2) in the secondary exercise increase metabolic load.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectVelocity-based traininges_ES
dc.subjectStrength traininges_ES
dc.subjectNeuromuscular fatiguees_ES
dc.titleEffects of Varying Antagonist Exercise Volume in Upper-Body Supersets on Mechanical, Metabolic, and Perceptual Responses in Resistance-Trained Menes_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/jfmk10040419
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

[PDF]

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución 4.0 Internacional