| dc.contributor.author | Márquez, Gonzalo | |
| dc.contributor.author | Coutado-Sánchez, Etham | |
| dc.contributor.author | Villaraviz-Ferro, Adrián | |
| dc.contributor.author | Marcos-Frutos, Daniel | |
| dc.contributor.author | García Ramos, Amador | |
| dc.contributor.author | Colomer-Poveda, David | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-11-25T09:26:57Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-11-25T09:26:57Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-10-23 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Márquez, G.; CoutadoSánchez, E.; Villaraviz-Ferro, A.; Marcos-Frutos, D.; García-Ramos, A.; Colomer-Poveda, D. Effects of Varying Antagonist Exercise Volume in UpperBody Supersets on Mechanical, Metabolic, and Perceptual Responses in Resistance-Trained Men. J. Funct. Morphol. Kinesiol. 2025, 10, 419. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk10040419 | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10481/108290 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Objectives: This study aimed to analyze the effects of varying antagonist volume in upperbody supersets on mechanical (lifting velocity), metabolic (blood lactate), and perceptual
(perceived exertion) variables. Methods: A randomized crossover study was conducted
in which 14 resistance-trained men performed three strength training conditions. In the
control condition (CTR), participants performed four sets of bench press with 8 repetitions
at their 12-repetition maximum load, whereas in the experimental conditions, a prone
bench pull was performed immediately after the bench press using 33% (SS1) or 66% (SS2)
of the individual’s maximum possible repetitions. Lifting velocity, lactate concentration,
and perceived exertion were measured. Repeated-measures ANOVA or Friedman test was
applied to compare conditions, with Bonferroni-corrected post hoc tests and effect sizes
reported. Results: Despite a progressive decrease in mean set velocity (p < 0.001) and
fastest set velocity across sets (p = 0.014) in the agonist exercise (i.e., bench press), these
variables did not significantly differ between conditions. The only difference observed
was a lower mean set velocity during the prone bench pull in the SS2 condition compared
to the SS1 condition (p = 0.011). Perceived exertion also increased across sets (p < 0.001),
with no differences between protocols. Blood lactate concentration, measured before the
final set, was significantly higher in SS2 compared to CTR (p = 0.003) and SS1 (p < 0.001),
indicating a greater metabolic load during training. Conclusions: Agonist–antagonist
supersets allow for reduced training time without negatively impacting acute mechanical
performance in the agonist exercise. Low-fatigue configurations (SS1) in the secondary
exercise do not significantly increase lactate levels, while moderate-fatigue configurations
(SS2) in the secondary exercise increase metabolic load. | es_ES |
| dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
| dc.publisher | MDPI | es_ES |
| dc.rights | Atribución 4.0 Internacional | * |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | * |
| dc.subject | Velocity-based training | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Strength training | es_ES |
| dc.subject | Neuromuscular fatigue | es_ES |
| dc.title | Effects of Varying Antagonist Exercise Volume in Upper-Body Supersets on Mechanical, Metabolic, and Perceptual Responses in Resistance-Trained Men | es_ES |
| dc.type | journal article | es_ES |
| dc.rights.accessRights | open access | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/jfmk10040419 | |
| dc.type.hasVersion | VoR | es_ES |