Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMárquez, Gonzalo
dc.contributor.authorCoutado-Sánchez, Etham
dc.contributor.authorVillaraviz-Ferro, Adrián
dc.contributor.authorMarcos-Frutos, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Ramos, Amador 
dc.contributor.authorColomer-Poveda, David
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-25T09:26:57Z
dc.date.available2025-11-25T09:26:57Z
dc.date.issued2025-10-23
dc.identifier.citationMárquez, G.; CoutadoSánchez, E.; Villaraviz-Ferro, A.; Marcos-Frutos, D.; García-Ramos, A.; Colomer-Poveda, D. Effects of Varying Antagonist Exercise Volume in UpperBody Supersets on Mechanical, Metabolic, and Perceptual Responses in Resistance-Trained Men. J. Funct. Morphol. Kinesiol. 2025, 10, 419. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk10040419es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/108290
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This study aimed to analyze the effects of varying antagonist volume in upperbody supersets on mechanical (lifting velocity), metabolic (blood lactate), and perceptual (perceived exertion) variables. Methods: A randomized crossover study was conducted in which 14 resistance-trained men performed three strength training conditions. In the control condition (CTR), participants performed four sets of bench press with 8 repetitions at their 12-repetition maximum load, whereas in the experimental conditions, a prone bench pull was performed immediately after the bench press using 33% (SS1) or 66% (SS2) of the individual’s maximum possible repetitions. Lifting velocity, lactate concentration, and perceived exertion were measured. Repeated-measures ANOVA or Friedman test was applied to compare conditions, with Bonferroni-corrected post hoc tests and effect sizes reported. Results: Despite a progressive decrease in mean set velocity (p < 0.001) and fastest set velocity across sets (p = 0.014) in the agonist exercise (i.e., bench press), these variables did not significantly differ between conditions. The only difference observed was a lower mean set velocity during the prone bench pull in the SS2 condition compared to the SS1 condition (p = 0.011). Perceived exertion also increased across sets (p < 0.001), with no differences between protocols. Blood lactate concentration, measured before the final set, was significantly higher in SS2 compared to CTR (p = 0.003) and SS1 (p < 0.001), indicating a greater metabolic load during training. Conclusions: Agonist–antagonist supersets allow for reduced training time without negatively impacting acute mechanical performance in the agonist exercise. Low-fatigue configurations (SS1) in the secondary exercise do not significantly increase lactate levels, while moderate-fatigue configurations (SS2) in the secondary exercise increase metabolic load.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectVelocity-based traininges_ES
dc.subjectStrength traininges_ES
dc.subjectNeuromuscular fatiguees_ES
dc.titleEffects of Varying Antagonist Exercise Volume in Upper-Body Supersets on Mechanical, Metabolic, and Perceptual Responses in Resistance-Trained Menes_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/jfmk10040419
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES


Files in this item

[PDF]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución 4.0 Internacional
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución 4.0 Internacional