Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorBravo-Olmedo, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorReyes Botella, Candela
dc.contributor.authorOcaña-Peinado, Francisco Manuel
dc.contributor.authorManzano-Moreno, Francisco Javier
dc.contributor.authorRomero Olid, María De Nuria 
dc.contributor.authorOlmedo Gaya, María Victoria 
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-24T11:47:51Z
dc.date.available2025-11-24T11:47:51Z
dc.date.issued2025-10-28
dc.identifier.citationBravo-Olmedo, F.; Reyes-Botella, C.; OcañaPeinado, F.M.; Manzano-Moreno, F.J.; Romero-Olid, M.d.N.; OlmedoGaya, M.V. Effect of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Dental Implant Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Dent. J. 2025, 13, 500. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13110500es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/108262
dc.description.abstractBackground: The problem of antibiotic resistance is becoming increasingly serious worldwide due to uncontrolled prescription of antibiotics. Studies show conflicting results on the use or not of antibiotic prophylaxis associated with dental implant placement; its benefits are unclear, and its use is increasingly questioned. The aim of this randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) was to compare early implant failure and postoperative infectious complications between two groups of healthy, non-penicillin-allergic patients who received a single prophylactic dose of 2 g amoxicillin versus placebo 1 h before surgery for implants placed in a single operative field. Methods: A double-blind, parallel-group, single-center RCT was conducted. One hundred patients met the inclusion criteria and were randomly assigned to the amoxicillin (n = 50) or placebo (n = 50) group. The primary endpoints analyzed were early implant failure and the presence of postoperative infection at 7, 14, 30 and 90 days. The recommendations of the CONSORT 2025 statement for RCT reporting were followed. Results: A total of 151 implants were placed in 96 patients and 12 implants failed; 6 implants in the antibiotic group (7.7%) and 6 implants in the placebo group (8.2%), so no statistically significant differences were observed between groups in the rate of early implant failure. In contrast, 11 implants developed postoperative infection; 2 in the antibiotic group (2.6%) and 9 in the placebo group (12.3%), reaching statistically significant differences (p = 0.028). Conclusions: The use of antibiotic prophylaxis in healthy patients is not necessary to prevent early failure of implants placed in a single operative field; however, the higher rate of infectious complications in patients without antibiotic therapy still raises a question that requires further investigation.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectAmoxicillin es_ES
dc.subjectAntibiotic prophylaxises_ES
dc.subjectAntibiotic resistancees_ES
dc.titleEffect of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Dental Implant Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Triales_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/dj13110500
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

[PDF]

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

Atribución 4.0 Internacional
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que Atribución 4.0 Internacional