Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKanlı, Esra
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-04T07:45:52Z
dc.date.available2025-11-04T07:45:52Z
dc.date.issued2025-11-03
dc.identifier.citationKanlı, E (2025). Prevalence and predictors of educational neuromyths among teachers working with gifted students. REIDOCREA, 14(41), 608-619.es_ES
dc.identifier.issn2254-5883
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/107712
dc.descriptionEsra Kanlı - Ege University - 0000-0002-5352-5615es_ES
dc.descriptionRecepción: 08.08.2025 | Aceptado: 03.11.2025es_ES
dc.descriptionCorrespondencia a través de ORCID: Esra Kanlı - 0000-0002-5352-5615es_ES
dc.descriptionArea or category of knowledge: Educationes_ES
dc.description.abstractAbstract: Educational neuromyths—misconceptions about brain function and learning—continue to persist among educators despite advances in neuroscience and science communication. This study investigated the prevalence of such myths among 454 teachers working in Science and Art Centers (BILSEMs) across Turkey, which are specialized after-school programs for gifted learners. Participants completed a survey including 15 neuromyth statements and 15 scientifically accurate brain knowledge assertions, alongside questions about their background, self-assessed competence, and professional development experiences. Descriptive analyses revealed that over half of the participants endorsed seven or more neuromyths, with the most believed myths relating to learning styles, enriched environments, and hemispheric dominance. Other factors, including gender and teaching experience, were not significantly associated with the endorsement of neuromyths or the understanding of brain-related concepts. Multiple regression analyses indicated that greater knowledge about the brain does not necessarily reduce belief in neuromyths. Additionally, general brain knowledge was positively associated with reading popular science materials and self-perceived competence, while showing a weak negative association with teaching experience. These findings underscore the pressing need for targeted neuroscience literacy initiatives within teacher education programs, especially for educators working with gifted students, who are frequently believed to possess distinct neurological characteristics. Correcting these misconceptions is crucial for fostering the implementation of evidence-based practices in gifted education.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipEge University (Turkey)es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherUniversidad de Granadaes_ES
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectNeuromyths in Educationes_ES
dc.titlePrevalence and predictors of educational neuromyths among teachers working with gifted studentses_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES


Files in this item

[mp4]
[PDF]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución 4.0 Internacional
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución 4.0 Internacional