Ultrasound-Guided Versus Traditional Refill of Intrathecal Infusion Pumps: A Prospective Quasi-Experimental Clinical Study
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Lechuga Carrasco, Beatriz; Martínez-Linares, Jose Manuel; Ávila-Cabreja, José Alejandro; Cortés-Martín, Jonathan; Piqueras-Sola, Beatriz; Cordero Tous, Nicolás; Gálvez Mateos, RafaelEditorial
MDPI
Materia
intrathecal infusion pump pain nursing re-loading portal ultrasound
Fecha
2025-10-30Referencia bibliográfica
Carrasco, B.L.; Martínez-Linares, J.M.; Ávila-Cabreja, J.A.; Cortés-Martín, J.; Piqueras-Sola, B.; Tous, N.C.; Mateos, R.G. Ultrasound-Guided Versus Traditional Refill of Intrathecal Infusion Pumps: A Prospective Quasi-Experimental Clinical Study. Biomedicines 2025, 13, 2671. https://doi.org/10.3390/ biomedicines13112671
Resumen
Background: There are multiple treatments and approaches available to manage pain. However, when these interventions fail to achieve adequate relief, pain management may involve the implantation of intrathecal infusion pumps. The use of ultrasound guidance may enhance nursing practice by improving procedural efficiency and patient comfort. This technique offers a more precise, safer, and less painful approach, potentially increasing patient satisfaction and reducing procedural complications. Aim: To evaluate patient pain levels during intrathecal infusion pump refills under ultrasound guidance compared to the traditional approach, also aiming to determine the time taken per technique and to assess related intra-procedural complications. Design: A prospective quasi-experimental pre-post study. Methods: The study population included individuals with intrathecal infusion
pumps. Each participant underwent two refill visits: one using the traditional method and the subsequent refill using ultrasound guidance. The time required to complete the procedure, any complications, and pain related to the procedure were measured for both techniques. Time was measured using a stopwatch, and pain was assessed at the end of each procedure using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Results: A total of 45 patients (25 men and 20 women), with a median age of 56.0 years were included. The estimated mean refill duration was 13.67 min for the traditional method versus 7.26 min for ultrasoundguided refills, representing a 53.2% reduction. The adjusted mean VAS was 2.76 (2.27–3.24) with ultrasound versus 5.91 (5.20–6.62) with the traditional method, yielding an adjusted mean difference of −3.16 (−4.02 to −2.30; p < 0.001). Reductions were consistent across subgroups defined by sex, refill duration, inter-procedural interval, intrathecal medication, and medical history. Complications occurred in 20.0% of traditional refills but in none of the ultrasound-guided procedures. Conclusions: Ultrasound guidance significantly
reduces pain, complications, and procedure time, positioning it as the new standard of care for intrathecal pump refills. This mandates its immediate integration into nursing protocols and health management policies.





