Aerobiological modeling I: A review of predictive models
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemEditorial
Elsevier
Materia
Aerobiology Airborne fungal spores Airborne pollen
Fecha
2021Referencia bibliográfica
Published version: Vélez-Pereira, A. M., De Linares, C., & Belmonte, J. (2021). Aerobiological modeling I: A review of predictive models. Science of The Total Environment, 795, 148783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148783
Patrocinador
Spanish Ministry of Science and Technology CGL2012-39523-C02-01/CLI, CTM2017-86565-C2-1-O; Catalan Government AGAUR “2017SGR1692”; Administrative Department of Science, Technology and Innovation-COLCIENCIAS (Colombia); ICTA 'Unit of Excellence' (MinECo, MDM2015-0552); Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo – ANID, Chile EcoClimatico LAB “R17A10002”, RECCA “R19F10004”, PATSER “R20F0002”; Gobierno Regional de Aysén FILTRO BIP 40021825-0Resumen
The present work is the first of two reviews on applied modeling in the field of aerobiology. The aerobiological predictive models for pollen and fungal spores, usually defined as predictive statistical models, will, amongst other objectives, forecast airborne particles’ concentration or dynamical behavior of the particles. These models can be classified into Observation Based Models (OBM), Phenological Based Models (PHM), or OTher Models (OTM). The aim of this review is to show, analyze and discuss the different predictive models used in pollen and spore aerobiological studies. The analysis was performed on published electronic scientific articles from 1998 to 2016 relates to the type of model, the taxa and the modelled parameters. From a total of 503 studies, 55.5% used OBM (44.8% on pollen and 10.7% on fungal spores), 38.5% PHM (all on pollen) and 6% OTM (5.4% pollen and 0.6% on fungal spores). OBM have been used with high frequency to forecast concentration. The most frequent model of OBM was linear regression (18.5% out of 503) on pollen and artificial neural networks (4.6%) on fungal spores. In the PHM, the principal use was to characterize the main pollen season (flowering season) based on the model of growth degree days. Finally, OTM have been used to estimate concentrations at unmonitored areas. Olea (14,5%) and Alternaria (4,8%) were the genera of pollen and fungal spores (respectively) that were most frequently modeled. Daily concentration was the most modeled parameter by OBM (25.2%) and season start day by PHM (35.6%). The PHM approaches include greater model diversity and use fewer independent variables than OBM. In addition, PHM show to be easier to apply than OBM; however, the wide range of criteria to define the parameters to use in PHM (eg: pollination season start day) makes that each model is used with a lesser frequency than other models.




