Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorSánchez Gómez, Ana Isabel 
dc.contributor.authorFernández, Aida
dc.contributor.authorLorite, Almudena
dc.contributor.authorBerzosa Sáez, Clotilde 
dc.contributor.authorMiró Morales, María Elena 
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Narváez-Cabeza de Vaca, María del Pilar 
dc.contributor.authorQuevedo Blasco, Raúl Rubén 
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-20T06:57:06Z
dc.date.available2025-10-20T06:57:06Z
dc.date.issued2025-10-03
dc.identifier.citationSánchez, A. I., Fernández, A., Lorite, A., Berzosa Sáez, C., Miró, E., Martínez, M. P., & Quevedo-Blasco, R. (2025). Sociodemographic and psychological profile of offenders in alternative penal measures: A comparative study of the TASEVAL, PRIA-MA, and reGENER@r programs. Social Sciences, 14, 589. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14100589es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/107140
dc.description.abstractGender-based violence (GBV) and traffic offenses pose significant public health challenges and contribute to widespread social issues globally. This study examines the sociodemographic and psychological profiles of individuals who commit traffic offenses and GBV, focusing on three alternative penal programs: TASEVAL (for traffic offenses), PRIA-MA, and reGENER@r (both for GBV). The study involved 54 participants distributed across these programs, using various psychometric tests to assess their profiles. Participants across the three programs (TASEVAL, PRIA-MA, and reGENER@R) were comparable in age (mean range 39.13–40.69 years) and nationality, with roughly half having prior contact with the justice system. Educational levels varied, with TASEVAL participants mainly completing secondary education (43.8%), PRIA-MA participants primary education (43.8%), and reGENER@R participants post-secondary education (59.1%). Employment status differed slightly, with TASEVAL and reGENER@R participants mainly employed (62.5% and 63.6%, respectively), while most PRIA-MA participants were unemployed (56.3%). Family characteristics varied across groups. In TASEVAL, having a partner and no children predominated (62.5% and 31.3%); in PRIA-MA, not having a partner and having two children predominated (62.5% and 37.5%); and, in reGENER@R, not having a partner and having one child predominated (59.1% and 31.8%). No significant differences were observed in sociodemographic variables. Regarding psychological characteristics, results across all groups indicate a marked presence of psychopathological symptoms and difficulties in emotional intelligence domains, with a significant correlation between psychological traits and coping strategies. These findings highlight the importance of tailoring alternative penal measures to the specific characteristics of each group to enhance effectiveness and reduce recidivism.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectPsychological profilees_ES
dc.subjectAlternative penal measureses_ES
dc.subjectTASEVALes_ES
dc.subjectPRIA-MAes_ES
dc.subjectreGENER@res_ES
dc.titleSociodemographic and psychological profile of offenders in alternative penal measures: A comparative study of the TASEVAL, PRIA-MA, and reGENER@r programses_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/socsci14100589
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

[PDF]

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución 4.0 Internacional