Influence of Cannabidiol Use on Visual Function and Optical Quality: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Martino, Francesco; Ortiz Peregrina, Sonia; Casares López, Miriam; Granados Delgado, Pilar; Castro Torres, José Juan; González Anera, María Del RosarioEditorial
ARVO Journals
Fecha
2025-10-10Referencia bibliográfica
Martino F, Ortiz-Peregrina S, Casares-López M, Granados-Delgado P, Castro-Torres JJ, Anera RG. Influence of cannabidiol use on visual function and optical quality: A randomized controlled trial. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2025;14(10):10, https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.14.10.10
Patrocinador
- Proyecto C-EXP-194-UGR23 financiado por Consejería de Universidad, Investigación e Innovación, y FEDER/Junta de Andalucía 2021–2027.; - Proyecto PID2020-115184RB-I00, financiado por MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033Resumen
Purpose: To study the influence of different concentrations of vaporized cannabidiol
(CBD; 0%, 15%, and 30%) on visual function and optical quality.
Methods: A randomized, crossover, double-blind, placebo-controlled, experimental
study was conducted. A total of 30 participants with a mean age of 26.0 ± 6.3 years
completed the study. Placebo (0 mg of CBD), 15% (16 mg of CBD), and 30% (32 mg
of CBD) concentrations of CBD were employed. Visual function was evaluated through
various tests, including pupil size, static and dynamic visual acuity, contrast sensitivity,
dot motion detection, visual disturbance index (VDI), and stereoacuity. Optical quality
was assessed by log(s), modulation transfer function (MTF) cutoff, objective scattering
index (OSI), and Strehl ratio. Self-perceived visual effects were also recorded.
Results: There was no significant impairment of static and dynamic visual acuity.
Contrast sensitivity was unaffected by CBD use. Mean dotmotion detection showed no
differences among the three concentrations. In optical quality, none of the parameters
worsened under CBD use. No changes were observed for the VDI. In addition, no deterioration
was observed for stereoacuity at distance or near. No changes in pupil size were
found after CBD consumption.
Conclusions: This non-psychotropic CBD did not appear to adversely affect vision and
seems to be a safe substance in the short term at the concentrations assessed.
Translational Relevance: The use of this cannabinoidwould not be dangerous for tasks
that rely heavily on vision. This study could be useful and helpful for evidence-based
decision-making for public health policy on its use.





