Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorAlonso, Cristina
dc.contributor.authorCoderch, Luisa
dc.contributor.authorCalpena, Ana Cristina
dc.contributor.authorClares Naveros, Beatriz 
dc.contributor.authorRamos, Anderson
dc.contributor.authorMartí, Meritxell
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-09T12:26:45Z
dc.date.available2025-10-09T12:26:45Z
dc.date.issued2025-07-10
dc.identifier.citationAlonso Merino, C., Coderch, L., Calpena, A., Clares, B., Ramos, A., Martí, M. Protection of Mucous Membranes Against the Use of Biocides. J Pharm Innov 20, 131 (2025).es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/106925
dc.description.abstractBackground Biocides, in touch with the mucosa or skin, are capable of penetrating the mucosa or skin and causing possible local lesions, such as irritations, allergic contact dermatitis and even systemic effects such as carcinogenesis. The high permeability of compounds across the oral or nasal mucosa is widely known, in comparison to the poor penetration across the skin. Therefore, the main objective of this work is to produce a formulation that can strengthen the mucosa, increasing its hindering effect and thus decreasing or avoiding the penetration of contaminants and biocides. Results Several compositions have been formulated and assayed; the hydrophobic formulation F1, the hydrophilic formulation F2 and the liposomal formulations F3 with lipids and structure similar to those present in cutaneous keratinous tissues. These all induced a waterproofing effect with the liposomal formulation F3 and in particular the hydrophobic formulation F1 inducing the greatest decrease in Trans-mucosal water loss. Permeation of the three biocides Fungitrol, Propiconazole and Permethrin was evaluated in skin and in untreated and treated (F1, F2, F3) oral mucosal membranes. The influence of the three formulations on each of the biocides used is considerable, reaching values significantly equal to those of the skin for formulation 1. While hydrophilic formulation 2 greatly increases permeability, hydrophobic formulation 1 and liposomal formulation 3 reduce permeability, in approximately 90% and 60% respectively, providing an almost skin-like barrier effect. Conclusions Therefore, this work presents two formulations that induce mucosal impermeability by reducing the penetration of three model biocides.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, “Modificación de la mucosa como protección frente al SARS-COV-2” (CSIC-COV19-130)es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipMCIN/AEI (PID2020-115663GB-C3-2)es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipAGAUR (Generalitat de Catalunya, 2021 SGR 01085)es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherSpringer Naturees_ES
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Licensees_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es_ES
dc.subjectBiocideses_ES
dc.subjectToxicses_ES
dc.subjectCeramideses_ES
dc.subjectProtection es_ES
dc.subjectMembrane permeabilityes_ES
dc.titleProtection of Mucous Membranes Against the Use of Biocideses_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12247-025-09995-2
dc.type.hasVersionAMes_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

[PDF]

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License