Can Rhodiola rosea supplementation mitigate digital eye strain? A triple-blinded placebo-controlled study
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Lara, Paula M.; Vera Vílchez, Jesús; Marcos-Frutos, Daniel; Alix Fages, Carlos; Jiménez Martínez, Pablo; García Ramos, Amador; Redondo Cabrera, BeatrizEditorial
John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Materia
Accommodation Computer vision syndrome Visual ergonomics
Fecha
2025-08-27Referencia bibliográfica
Lara, P. M., Vera, J., Marcos-Frutos, D., Alix-Fages, C., Jiménez-Martínez, P., García-Ramos, A., & Redondo, B. (2025). Can Rhodiola rosea supplementation mitigate digital eye strain? A triple-blinded placebo-controlled study. Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.70005
Patrocinador
Consejería de Universidad, Investigación e Innovación de la Junta de Andalucía (C-EXP-241-UGR23)Resumen
Purpose: This study aimed to assess the impact of Rhodiola rosea (RR) supplementation on the dynamics of the accommodative response and digital eye strain (DES)
symptoms following 30-min visual tasks with different levels of cognitive demand.
Methods: Eighteen young adults (mean age±SD: 24.6±4.0years) participated in
this placebo-controlled, triple-blind, balanced crossover study. Participants completed four sessions separated by 1week in a randomised order. The sessions differed in the supplement (RR or placebo) and cognitive demand of the visual task
(Stroop test or control video). The supplementation consisted of 1200mg of RR or
placebo per day for 4days (two 300mg capsules every 12h) and a washout period of
3days was allowed before the subsequent condition. The lag and variability of the
accommodative response were measured at 500, 40 and 20cm using an open-field
autorefractor, and DES symptoms were assessed using a 10-item questionnaire.
Results: RR supplementation caused a reduction in the variability of accommodation (p=0.007) and the perceived levels of ‘Blurred vision when looking into the
distance at the end of the near task’ (p=0.009). However, the lag of accommodation (p=0.15) and the remainder of the DES symptoms were unaffected by the
ingestion of RR (p>0.05 in all cases). The reduction in the variability of accommodation after RR intake was observed at 40 and 20cm (p-values <0.001 and 0.04,
respectively), but not at far distance (500cm, p=0.40).
Conclusions: These findings show that RR supplementation (1200mg/day for
4days) produced a reduction in the variability of accommodation and one of the
assessed DES symptoms, suggesting that it could be considered as a potential
strategy to prevent or manage DES. However, further research is needed to determine its clinical relevance and optimise dosage and timing.





