AI-Based Prediction of Visual Performance in Rhythmic Gymnasts Using Eye-Tracking Data and Decision Tree Models
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Bernardez-Vilaboa, Ricardo; Povedano-Montero, F. Javier; Trillo-Vílchez, José Ramón; Ruiz-Pomeda, Alicia; Martínez-Florentín, Gema; Cedrún-Sánchez, Juan E.Editorial
MDPI
Materia
eye tracking machine learning visual performance rhythmic gymnastics decision tree classification biomedical optics
Fecha
2025-07-14Referencia bibliográfica
Bernardez-Vilaboa, R.; Povedano-Montero, F.J.; Trillo, J.R.; Ruiz-Pomeda, A.; Martínez-Florentín, G.; Cedrún-Sánchez, J.E. AI-Based Prediction of Visual Performance in Rhythmic Gymnasts Using Eye-Tracking Data and Decision Tree Models. Photonics 2025, 12, 711. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics12070711
Resumen
Background/Objective: This study aims to evaluate the predictive performance of three
supervised machine learning algorithms—decision tree (DT), support vector machine
(SVM), and k-nearest neighbors (KNN) in forecasting key visual skills relevant to rhythmic
gymnastics. Methods: A total of 383 rhythmic gymnasts aged 4 to 27 years were evaluated
in various sports centers across Madrid, Spain. Visual assessments included clinical tests
(near convergence point accommodative facility, reaction time, and hand–eye coordination)
and eye-tracking tasks (fixation stability, saccades, smooth pursuits, and visual acuity)
using the DIVE (Devices for an Integral Visual Examination) system. The dataset was split
into training (70%) and testing (30%) subsets. Each algorithm was trained to classify visual
performance, and predictive performance was assessed using accuracy and macro F1-score
metrics. Results: The decision tree model demonstrated the highest performance, achieving
an average accuracy of 92.79% and a macro F1-score of 0.9276. In comparison, the SVM and
KNN models showed lower accuracies (71.17% and 78.38%, respectively) and greater difficulty in correctly classifying positive cases. Notably, the DT model outperformed the others
in predicting fixation stability and accommodative facility, particularly in short-duration
fixation tasks. Conclusion: The decision tree algorithm achieved the highest performance in
predicting short-term fixation stability, but its effectiveness was limited in tasks involving
accommodative facility, where other models such as SVM and KNN outperformed it in
specific metrics. These findings support the integration of machine learning in sports vision
screening and suggest that predictive modeling can inform individualized training and
performance optimization in visually demanding sports such as rhythmic gymnastics.





