Masking Ability of CAD-CAM Materials at Different Thicknesses: A Study on Color, Translucency, and Infinite Optical Thickness
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Arruda Mascaro, Bruno; Tejada Casado, María de la Nativida; García Fonseca, Renata; Cardona Pérez, Juan De La Cruz; dos Santos Nunes Reis, José Maurício; Pérez Gómez, María Del MarEditorial
Wiley
Materia
Color Dental materials Infinite optical thickness Masking ability Thickness color
Fecha
2025-05-27Referencia bibliográfica
Mascaro, B.A., Tejada-Casado, M., Fonseca, R.G., Cardona, J.C., dos Santos Nunes Reis, J.M. and Pérez, M.M. (2025), Masking Ability of CAD-CAM Materials at Different Thicknesses: A Study on Color, Translucency, and Infinite Optical Thickness. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13490
Patrocinador
São Paulo Research State Foundation (FAPESP) (2022/12431-5 and 2023/15441-4); Ministerio de Ciencia Innovación y Universidades - FEDER (PID2022.142151OB.I00); Consejería de Universidad, Investigación e Innovación - FEDER Andalusia Program 2021–2027 (C-EXP-276-UGR23)Resumen
Objective: To evaluate the masking ability of different thicknesses of CAD-CAM resin-matrix and feldspar porcelain materials.
Materials and Methods: Specimens (Ø7.5mm, thickness 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5mm, n=3/material) were fabricated from Lava
Ultimate-LU, Grandio Blocs-GB, VITA Enamic-VE, and VITA Mark II-VM. Backgrounds were obtained from nine composite
die shades (ND1-ND9, IPS Natural Die Material). Spectral reflectance was measured for samples against a black background and
each ND background. CIEDE2000 color differences (ΔE00), relative translucency parameter differences (ΔRTP00), and infinite
optical thickness (X∞) were calculated. ΔE00 data among materials were analyzed using Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney
tests (α=0.05). ΔE00 between thicknesses and ΔRTP00 data were compared to perceptible and acceptable thresholds. Root mean
square error (RMSE) and goodness-of-fit (GFC) were used as performance behavior of X∞.
Results: VM exhibited the lowest ΔE00 (p<0.001) and ΔRTP00 values across all tested conditions. Overall, LU and GB did not
differ for 0.5 and 1.0mm. Regardless of the background, when comparing 1.0–1.5mm, acceptable ΔE00 were observed, with only
VM showing imperceptible values. Good spectral match and good comparative values of X∞ were found for LU-GB.
Conclusion: The masking effect depended on material and thickness, with VM and thicker samples demonstrating superior
results. In general, the spectral behavior and values of infinite optical thickness differed among materials.
Clinical Significance: The masking ability of high-translucency CAD-CAM materials was influenced by composition, thickness, and the underlying tooth-colored background. Materials with lower translucency and greater thickness are recommended
for highly discolored teeth. Vita Mark II was the most suitable material for restorations on darkened substrates.





