Cuestiones procesales de la acumulación de acciones en materia de nulidad de cláusulas abusivas

Abstract

El trabajo aborda las siguientes cuestiones relativas a la acumulación de acciones en procesos en los que intervienen consumidores y usuarios: ¿Se trataría de una acumulación de acciones o de pretensiones? ¿Pueden ejercitarse todas las pretensiones de declaración de nulidad en un único proceso? ¿Se trata de acciones conexas? ¿Se cumplen los requisitos de la acumulación? ¿Cuál es la cuantía del proceso en el que se han acumulado las acciones? ¿Qué efectos conlleva la acumulación?

Into practice is normal that we find with contracts which incorporate some general conditions of contract that could be abusive and that carry to the legal professional to ask himself if it is possible to postulate their annulment of proceedings in a unique process. The answer that could seem simple in advance, it becomes more complex, when we examinate the joinder in The Procedure Law, so this law is not clear in the procedural categories used and the legal professional may have certain doubs about the action concept, the expectation action, or related action, for example. This situation produces so many questions at the moment of applying the rules of the joinder of actions. It would be deal with the joinder of legal actions or the remedies sought? Could they bring all actions for nullity in a unique process? Are they related actions? Are the criteria of joined actions respected?? How much is the quantity of the process in what the actions have been joined? What are the effects of the joined of actions?