Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSafonova, Svetlana Sergeevna
dc.contributor.authorChupryakova, Olga Anatolevna
dc.contributor.authorGanitseva, Anna Vladislavovna
dc.contributor.authorVotyakova, Irina Aleksandrovna
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-14T10:20:37Z
dc.date.available2025-07-14T10:20:37Z
dc.date.issued2022-11
dc.identifier.citationSafonova, S. S., Chupryakova, O. A., Ganitseva, A. V., & Votyakova, I. A. (2022). Semantic and Functional Status of Comparative Units in Mass Media Discourse. En. Resmilitaris, 12(3), 838-845. ISSN: 2265-6294es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/105280
dc.description.abstractThe article is devoted to the linguistic analysis of the semantics and functioning of comparative units in publicistic discourse. It notes that the category of comparative actively interacts with the categories of emotional evaluation, imagery and intensity, and that as a result of comparison they appear as units of speech in which the “Subject - Ground - Object” model is implemented. In the corpus of comparative units, there are comparisons-associations (figurative), which serve to metaphorize the statement, and comparisons-identities, represented by turns of subject-logical and comparative-comparative types. In journalistic discourse, comparisons formed in a syntactic way are the most common, lexical means of expressing comparative meaning are less commonly used, morphological means of formalizing comparison are the least common. Among the means of formalizing the semantics of comparison, dominated by subordinating conjunctions, specialized in the transfer of the semantics of comparison and characterized by a comparative-comparative (what) or modal-comparative function (as if, as if, exactly), and a non-specialized conjunction (as). It is proved that comparative units are included in the structural organization of both simple and complex sentences, often forming a peripheral zone. At the same time, comparative constructions of real modality account for 61%, constructions with unions of unreal modality - 13%, and constructions with union than - 9%. 83% of the considered examples belong to the syntactic means of expressing comparative relations; to morphological means - 4%, of which 1% are instrumental comparisons and 3% are prepositions expressing comparative relations; lexical means of expressing comparative relations are represented by 13% of the analyzed material, of which 3% are stable comparisons. The semantic sphere “Man” dominates in the linguistic fabric of the newspaper and magazine discourse, in which the object of comparison is a certain historical person, a person of a certain kind of activity, etc., while the semantic sphere “Animal” is characterized by stable comparisonses_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherResmilitarises_ES
dc.relation.ispartofseriesResmilitaris;12(3)
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.titleSemantic and Functional Status of Comparative Units in Mass Media Discoursees_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES


Files in this item

[PDF]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional