Evolution in the peri-implant oral microbiome and their relationship to long-term marginal bone loss: A randomized clinical study
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Galindo Moreno, Pablo Antonio; Gutierrez Garrido, Lourdes; Duarte, Juan; Robles Vera, Iñaki; Martín Morales, Natividad; O'Valle Ravassa, Francisco Javier; Olaechea, Allinson; Carrillo Gálvez, Ana Belén; Padial Molina, MiguelEditorial
Wiley
Materia
Marginal bone loss Early loading Dental implants Microbiome Peri-Implantitis
Fecha
2025-03-10Referencia bibliográfica
Galindo-Moreno P, Gutierrez-Garrido L, Duarte J, Robles-Vera I, Martin-Morales N, O'Valle F, Olaechea A, Carrillo-Galvez AB, Padial-Molina M. Evolution in the Peri-Implant Oral Microbiome and Their Relationship to Long-Term Marginal Bone Loss: A Randomized Clinical Study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2025 Jul;36(7):802-820. doi: 10.1111/clr.14426. Epub 2025 Mar 10. PMID: 40062725; PMCID: PMC12230925.
Patrocinador
This investigation was partially supported by the Research Cathedra MIS – University of Granada funded by MIS Implants Technologies Ltd., the Research Cathedra Dentsply Sirona – University of Granada funded by Dentsply Sirona Iberia, by Grant PID2020-116347RB-I00 funded by MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033, and by Research Groups #CTS-138, #CTS-164, #CTS-1028 (Junta de Andalucía, Spain).Resumen
Objectives: To analyze the clinical, radiographic and microbiological changes around implants with a multiphosphonate-treated surface, prosthetically loaded with two different protocols, after five years of functional loading.
Material and methods: A randomized clinical trial was designed to initiate prosthetic loading over single dental implants after 8 (control) or 4 weeks (test). Several variables were analyzed, including patient’s level variables, intrasulcular biofilm and marginal bone level at several time points, from 1 to 60 months after loading.
Results: 23 patients attended the 5 years follow-up visit. No clinical variable changed over time, except mucosal thickness from dental impressions to prosthesis delivery. No significant radiographic differences were observed neither over time nor between groups. Microbiologically, there was a change in the microbiome from the constitution of the biological width to the final follow-up. Seven species changed significantly, with a significant increase in Porphyromonas gingivalis and Tannerella forsythia from 12 to 60 months and a decrease in the other species. However, changes in relative abundance of species along the time, whether increasing or decreasing, did not show a correlation with marginal bone loss.
Conclusion: Implants with a multiphosphonate-treated surface showed no differences in clinical and radiographic variables after 5 years of function, regardless of the prosthetic loading protocol used. From a microbiological point of view, although there was an evolution of the microbiome in the peri-implant sulcus towards Socransky's red circle pathogenic bacteria, no microorganism showed significant correlation with the radiographic changes produced in the peri-implant bone over time.