Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorEstepa-Cantero, Cecilia
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Bazán, Jesús Carlos 
dc.contributor.authorBolaños-Jiménez, Rocío
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-10T07:51:03Z
dc.date.available2025-07-10T07:51:03Z
dc.date.issued2025-06-21
dc.identifier.citationPublished version: Estepa-Cantero, Cecilia et al. International Journal of Multiphase Flow Volume 191, October 2025, 105325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2025.105325es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/105163
dc.descriptionThis work was supported by the coordinated project PID2020-115961RB-C31, PID2020-115961RB-C32, financed by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by PID2023-151343NB-C32, financed by MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by FEDER, UE. R. Bolaños-Jiménez would like to acknowledge the University of Jaén project M.2 PDC 1484 financed by Programa Operativo FEDER Andalucía 2021-2027. C. Estepa-Cantero would like to thank the Spanish Ministry of Universities for the financial support the Fellowship FPU20/02197 provided.es_ES
dc.description.abstractThe optimisation of industrial processes involving bubbly flows requires a deeper understanding of the forces acting on the bubbles, being particularly challenging when they rise in the presence of solid surfaces. The evolution of the drag and lift forces on a bubble rising in a stagnant liquid near a vertical wall is experimentally characterised here by high-speed imaging. The hydrodynamic forces are determined non-intrusively by applying the Kirchhoffequations to the bubble motion, using the experimental evolution of the bubble velocity and geometry. Three different rising regimes are investigated, namely, rectilinear, zigzag, and spiral, where the initial dimensionless initial horizontal wall-bubble distance, L, is varied from 1 ≤ L ≤ 4. The three cases, which fall near the transition between regimes, are defined by the Bond and Galilei numbers, (Bo,Ga) ≈ (5,60), (4,99), and (10,108), respectively, being the resulting Reynolds numbers, 60≤ Re ≤ 110. In all regimes, both the drag and lift forces increase as L decreases, even after the bubble has moved far enough away from the wall. In the rectilinear case, they remain nearly constant as the bubble rises, whereas in the unstable cases, they oscillate at twice the frequency of the bubble trajectory. The drag coefficient reaches its maximum value when the velocity is vertically aligned, while the lift coefficient peaks when the bubble is at its largest lateral distance. These results are of particular interest because, to our knowledge, there are currently no correlations in the literature that can accurately estimate the hydrodynamic forces within this range of parameters and under the influence of a nearby wall. Furthermore, the experimental measurements presented here could be used as a benchmark for more detailed numerical investigations.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipMCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 PID2020-115961RB-C31, PID2020-115961RB-C32es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipMICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 PID2023-151343NB-C32es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipFEDER, UEes_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity of Jaén M.2 PDC 1484es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipFEDER Andalucía 2021-2027es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipSpanish Ministry of Universities FPU20/02197es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.subjectBubble dynamicses_ES
dc.subjectBubble risees_ES
dc.subjectBubble shapees_ES
dc.subjectWall effectes_ES
dc.subjectKirchhoff equationses_ES
dc.subjectDrag and lift forceses_ES
dc.titleHydrodynamic forces on high Bond bubbles rising near a vertical wall at moderate Reynolds numbers: An experimental approaches_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2025.105325
dc.type.hasVersionSMURes_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

[PDF]

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem