Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBianca Varvara, Elena
dc.contributor.authorGasparik, Cristina
dc.contributor.authorRuiz López, Javier 
dc.contributor.authorAghiorghiesei, Alexandra Iulia
dc.contributor.authorCulic, Bogdan
dc.contributor.authorDudea, Diana
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-26T08:54:10Z
dc.date.available2025-06-26T08:54:10Z
dc.date.issued2025-04-18
dc.identifier.citationVarvara EB, Gasparik C, Ruiz-López J, Aghiorghiesei AI, Culic B, Dudea D. Color and Translucency Compatibility Among Various Resin-Based Composites and Layering Strategies. Dentistry Journal. 2025; 13(4):173. [DOI: 10.3390/dj13040173]es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/104870
dc.descriptionThis study was funded by Research Project PCD 1680/28 from the Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.es_ES
dc.description.abstract(1) Background: Natural-looking dental restorations require careful selection of the restorative material, with color and translucency characteristics similar to the natural dental structures. (2) Objectives: This research aimed to evaluate if there is compatibility regarding the color and translucency between different commercial RBCs in different layering recipes. (3) Methods: Sixty 1 mm thick disk specimens were produced from three different RBCs: ESS (Essentia-GC), BEG (Brilliant Ever Glow-Coltene), and IPS (IPS Empress Direct-Ivoclar Vivadent). Three different opacities and translucencies (enamel, dentin, and opaque shades) from each system were used in four recipes (R1-enamel, R2-dentin, R3-enamel and dentin, R4-enamel, dentin, and opaque) to obtain single-, double-, and triple-layered samples, respecting the anatomical layering technique. CIE L*, a*, b*, C*, h0 coordinates were recorded, and the relative translucency parameter (RTP00) was calculated. Further, the color differences (ΔE00) and the difference in translucencies ΔRTP00 were analyzed between the materials and between the layered recipes. (4) Results: The CIE L* and h° color coordinates and RTP00 showed significant differences among all three RBCs for all four recipes (p < 0.001). The decreasing order of translucency for each recipe was R1: ESS > BEG > IPS, R2 and R3: BEG > IPS > ESS, R4: BEG > ESS > IPS. Important differences were found in color and translucency among the recipes for each of the three RBCs tested (p < 0.001). The decreasing order of translucency for the tested RBCs was ESS: R1 > R3 > R4 > R2, BEG and IPS: R1 > R3 > R2 > R4. (5) Conclusions: No significant compatibility was observed in color and translucency among different layering recipes of the same composite materials nor between similar layering recipes when using different composites. The color differences between materials were more significant than the differences in translucency for each recipe.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectColor es_ES
dc.subjectTranslucencyes_ES
dc.subjectResin compositeses_ES
dc.subjectComposite layeringes_ES
dc.subjectBiomimetic dentistryes_ES
dc.titleColor and Translucency Compatibility Among Various Resin-Based Composites and Layering Strategieses_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/dj13040173
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES


Files in this item

[PDF]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución 4.0 Internacional
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución 4.0 Internacional