• español 
    • español
    • English
    • français
  • FacebookPinterestTwitter
  • español
  • English
  • français
Ver ítem 
  •   DIGIBUG Principal
  • 1.-Investigación
  • Departamentos, Grupos de Investigación e Institutos
  • Departamento de Estadística e Investigación Operativa
  • DEIO - Artículos
  • Ver ítem
  •   DIGIBUG Principal
  • 1.-Investigación
  • Departamentos, Grupos de Investigación e Institutos
  • Departamento de Estadística e Investigación Operativa
  • DEIO - Artículos
  • Ver ítem
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

A systematic review and meta-analysis on gender differences in the treatment of anxiety and depression

[PDF] International Journal os Social Psychiatry.pdf (1.884Mb)
Identificadores
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10481/104596
DOI: 10.1177/00207640251331898
Exportar
RISRefworksMendeleyBibtex
Estadísticas
Ver Estadísticas de uso
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítem
Autor
Bernal Arenas, María; Arroyo Sánchez, Andrés; Torres Parejo, Úrsula; Muñoz Negro, José Eduardo
Editorial
Sage
Materia
Gender identity
 
Mental health
 
Medicalization
 
Fecha
2025-05-09
Referencia bibliográfica
Bernal Arenas M, Arroyo-Sánchez A, Torres Parejo Ú, Muñoz-Negro JE. A systematic review and meta-analysis on gender differences in the treatment of anxiety and depression. International Journal of Social Psychiatry. 2025;0(0). doi:10.1177/00207640251331898
Resumen
Background: Gender disparity in mental health treatment has been a longstanding concern in healthcare. Women, who are disproportionately diagnosed with anxiety and depression, often receive more psychotropic medication than men. Aims: This study investigates gender disparity in the treatment of anxiety and depression, aiming to uncover the intersection of medical and social factors and their influence on psychiatric care. Methods: A systematic review methodology following PRISMA guidelines was performed. Literature searches were conducted on PubMed and Web of Science, including observational studies and excluding qualitative studies, which resulted in the screening of eight studies for an in-depth analysis which included meta-analysis. The GRADE approach was considered to address risk of bias. Results: The findings of this review reveal a clear gender disparity in the treatment of anxiety and depression, with women consistently experiencing over-treatment when compared to men, even after adjusting for mental health status and diagnosis frequency, with statistically significant results for the meta-analysis (PR = 1.45, 95% CI [1.12, 1.78]), concluding that women are 54% more likely than men of receiving psychotropic treatment for anxiety and depression. The reduced number of studies included is acknowledged as a limitation of the study. Conclusions: Addressing these issues requires a comprehensive understanding of biopsychosocial factors, integrating gender-inclusive politics into medical education and clinical practices. Recognizing and mitigating these underlying causes is paramount to reduce gender-based disparities in mental health and promoting better practices to achieve equitable health outcomes.
Colecciones
  • DEIO - Artículos

Mi cuenta

AccederRegistro

Listar

Todo DIGIBUGComunidades y ColeccionesPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMateriaFinanciaciónPerfil de autor UGREsta colecciónPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMateriaFinanciación

Estadísticas

Ver Estadísticas de uso

Servicios

Pasos para autoarchivoAyudaLicencias Creative CommonsSHERPA/RoMEODulcinea Biblioteca UniversitariaNos puedes encontrar a través deCondiciones legales

Contacto | Sugerencias