We are all feminist, but do we think the same? A focus group analysis of cisgender heterosexual and lesbian, bisexual, and queer women on the collaboration between feminist and LGBTIQA+ movement in Spain
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Galván-Hernández, Danna; Del Fresno Díaz, Ángel; Sáez-Lumbreras, Alba; Estevan-Reina, Lucía; Lemus Martín, Soledad DeEditorial
American Psychological Association
Materia
feminismo grupos focales cualitativo LGBTIQA+ solidaridad intraminoritaria
Fecha
2025Referencia bibliográfica
Published version: Galván-Hernández, D., del Fresno-Díaz, Á., Sáez-Lumbreras, A., Estevan-Reina, L., & de Lemus, S. (2025). “We are all feminist”, but do we think the same? A focus group analysis of cisgender heterosexual and lesbian, bisexual, and queer women on the collaboration between feminist and LGBTIQA+ movement in Spain. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 31(2), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000778
Patrocinador
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Spanish Ministry of Research FPU21/03042; MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033ERDF/EU PID2022.141182NB.I00Resumen
This study examines the perceptions of LBQ+ and heterosexual feminist cis women, regarding how they define feminism and perceive the relationship between the feminist and LGBTIQA+ movement in the context of progressive trans rights legislation in Spain (Trans Law, approved in 2023). Two two-hour focus groups were conducted with 12 feminist cis women, 6 of whom were LBQ+ and 6 heterosexuals. Data was analyzed through reflexive thematic analysis, identifying 3 themes: Feminism, conflicts in the feminist movement concerning the Trans Law and intergroup collaboration. While both groups held similar definitions of feminism, LBQ+ women emphasized the importance of an intersectional perspective. Both groups expressed interest in addressing gender inequalities and forming alliances but differed in their analysis of these alliances. Heterosexual women focused on alliance challenges and threats, while LBQ+ women emphasized the need of empathy and collaboration. Heterosexual women expressed mixed feelings toward the proposed Trans Law, whereas LBQ+ cis women expressed clear support for the law and the protection of trans rights. Participants suggested actions to promote the allyship (e.g. creating common spaces and confronting LGBTIQA+phobic aggressions). While both groups express willingness to collaborate, differences and challenges are inherent in diverse feminism. Such differences should be embraced as opportunities for debate and effective collaboration, to reduce conflict and promote social transformation. It demonstrates the potential of alliances between movements to address gender-related social inequalities as a global challenge.