What is the Impact of Endothelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition in Solid Tumours: A Qualitative Systematic Review and Quantitative Meta-Analysis
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Hernández Camarero, Pablo; Toledo Cutillas, María Belén; Díaz Ruano, Ana Belén; González Titos, Aitor; García Ortega, María Belén; Perán Quesada, MacarenaEditorial
Ivyspring International Publisher
Materia
Endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition Tumour microenvironment Metastasis Endothelial cell Cancer-associated fibroblast
Fecha
2025-02-24Referencia bibliográfica
Hernández-Camarero P, Toledo B, Diaz-Ruano AB, González-Titos A, García-Ortega MB, Perán M. What is the Impact of Endothelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition in Solid Tumours: A Qualitative Systematic Review and Quantitative Meta-Analysis. Int J Biol Sci. 2025 Feb 24;21(5):2155-2178. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.107045. PMID: 40083695; PMCID: PMC11900810
Patrocinador
Jaen University, Spain; Chair “Doctors Galera-Requena in cancer stem cell research” (CMC-CTS963)Resumen
Endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EndMT) has gained increasing recognition as a crucial mechanism in the
progression of solid cancers, influencing tumour heterogeneity, metastasis, and resistance to therapy.
However, despite its growing importance, EndMT remains insufficiently studied within the cancer research
landscape.
In this study, we conduct a systematic review, adhered to the 2020 PRISMA guidelines, of the existing literature
on EndMT in solid tumours, examining its functional roles, key biomarkers, underlying mechanisms,
experimental models, and potential as a target for therapeutic intervention. Our objective was to identify
critical areas where further research is needed. In addition, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the
variability in the expression of EndMT-related markers and their potential links to patient prognosis.
To this aim, literature searches were conducted in major databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of
Science, covering studies published up to June 2024. The risk of bias of selected articles was evaluated using the
OHAT tool, for the in vitro experiments and the SYRCLE tool for studies using animal models.
Out of an initial pool of 1,197 articles, 54 studies were selected for data extraction by two independent
reviewers. Selected studies were identified according to specific inclusion/exclusion criteria applied through
distinct stages like “title and abstract screening”, “full text article review” and “article bibliography screening”.
Our analysis confirms that EndMT is a key contributor to tumour progression and metastasis, but several
aspects remain poorly understood, particularly regarding the induction of EndMT in specific cancer types, its
role in lymphatic endothelial cells, and its interactions with other stromal elements. We observed substantial
heterogeneity in the biomarkers associated with EndMT, as well as variations in the endothelial cell types
studied, the functional outcomes, and the molecular mechanisms involved. Our meta-analysis revealed
significant variability in the expression of EndMT biomarkers, with notable correlations between changes in the
expression of specific genes and patient outcomes, particularly in lung cancer.
In conclusion, it is essential for future research to focus on identifying the specific cancer and stromal cell types
implicated in EndMT and to standardize endothelial cell models and protocols used for inducing EndMT.
Investigating EndMT alongside well-established processes, such as epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT),
and exploring its relationship with cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) may provide valuable insights into its
role in tumour biology and its impact on therapy resistance.