Exploring the causal involvement of the rIPL and white matter interindividual variability in spatial orienting and consciousness
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemEditorial
Elsevier
Materia
Consciousness Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) Spatial attention
Fecha
2025-03-25Referencia bibliográfica
J.J. Ramírez-Guerrero et al. NeuroImage 310 (2025) 121137 [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121137]
Patrocinador
European Union (EU); MCIN/AEI PID2020-119033 GB-I00; MICIU FPU21/01405; MICIU/AEI PID2023-150891NA-I00; Ministry of Economy, Knowledge, Enterprise, and Universities of AndalusiaResumen
Background: Spatial attention enables the selection of relevant over irrelevant stimuli through dorsal and ventral
fronto-parietal networks. These networks are connected through long white matter tracts, such as the superior
longitudinal fasciculus (SLF) and the Inferior Fronto-Occipital fasciculus (IFOF).
Objective/hypothesis: The main purpose of this study was to explore, in healthy participants, the causal role of the
right Inferior Parietal Lobe (rIPL) in spatial orienting and conscious perception. We also explored how interindividual
differences in the microstructural properties of white matter were related to the effects of transcranial
magnetic stimulation (TMS) and, secondarily, to attentional orienting effects in the control stimulation
condition.
Methods: Participants (n=51) performed a behavioural task involving the detection of a visual stimulus at the
threshold of consciousness, preceded by either central (endogenous) or peripheral (exogenous) cues. After cue
onset, a burst of TMS pulses was applied over the rIPL or a control active region (vertex). White matter properties
were explored through diffusion-weighted imaging tractography and whole-brain NODDI analysis.
Results: TMS over the rIPL (compared to the control condition) did not modulate spatial attention nor conscious
perception, but it decreased accuracy when attention was endogenously oriented (compared to the exogenous
condition) and speeded up reaction times when targets were presented in the attended right hemifield (compared
to the left hemifield). Part of the variability in the TMS and attentional orienting effects were explained by the
integrity of the SLF and the IFOF.
Conclusions: Individual variability in attentional orienting effects was associated with the anatomical links between
attentional networks. Negative correlations between TMS effects and relevant white matter tracts were
interpreted as compensatory mechanisms, while positive correlations with tracts innervating the stimulated area
could reflect a TMS signal propagation effect. These results will contribute to the understanding of the role of
white matter variability in the susceptibility to neuromodulation, with potential implications for research and
clinical treatment.





