Physiotherapist Online Assessment in Patients with Stroke: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Estebanez Pérez, María José; Pastora Estebanez, Pablo; Romero-García, Ismael; Vinolo Gil, María Jesús; Fernández Navarro, Rocío; Pastora Bernal, José ManuelEditorial
MDPI
Materia
Tele-assessment Systematic review Telerehabilitation Physiotherapy Stroke
Fecha
2025-03-28Referencia bibliográfica
Estebanez-Pérez, M.-J.; Pastora-Estebanez, P.; Romero-García, I.; Vinolo-Gil, M.J.; Fernández- Navarro, R.; Pastora-Bernal, J.-M. Physiotherapist Online Assessment in Patients with Stroke: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 2311. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14072311
Resumen
About 15 million people suffer a stroke each year, of which 10–15%
occur in people under 50 years of age. The clinical management of neurological disorders depends on reliable diagnostic tools to identify impairments and aid in the early
and accurate detection of disease. The objective of this study is to present a systematic
review protocol for identifying the scientific evidence on the use of tele-assessment compared with in-person assessment delivery by physiotherapists for stroke patients. This
protocol was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews
(PROSPERO) database (CRD42024613552). Methods: Original studies of any design in
which physiotherapy tele-assessment using videoconferencing compared with face-to-face
assessment for patients with stroke conditions will be included. The research will be carried
out in PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Library, PEDro (Physiotherapy Evidence Database),
and NICE. The risk of bias will be assessed using the Quality Appraisal Tool for studies of
diagnostic Reliability (QAREL) and the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
(QUADAS). Results: The screening, selection, and analysis process will be conducted by
two independent researchers and reviewed by a third evaluator to resolve any potential
disagreements. The feasibility of conducting a meta-analysis for quantitative data will be
evaluated based on the homogeneity analysis of the selected studies. Conclusions: We hope
that this systematic review protocol will provide scientific evidence for tele-assessment as a
physiotherapeutic assessment strategy for stroke patients and that it will be available as a
complementary tool to face-to-face physiotherapeutic assessments for specific situations.