Blood Plasma, Fibrinogen or Fibrin Biomaterial for the Manufacturing of Skin Tissue-Engineered Products and Other Dermatological Treatments: A Systematic Review
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Sierra Sánchez, Álvaro; Sanabria de la Torre, Raquel; Ubago Rodríguez, Ana Dolores; Quiñones Vico, María Isabel; Montero Vílchez, Trinidad; Sánchez Díaz, Manuel; Arias Santiago, Salvador AntonioEditorial
MDPI
Materia
Biomaterial Blood plasma Fibrin Fibrinogen Tissue-engineered skin substitute
Fecha
2025-02-22Referencia bibliográfica
Sierra-Sánchez, Á.; Sanabria-de la Torre, R.; Ubago- Rodríguez, A.; Quiñones-Vico, M.I.; Montero-Vílchez, T.; Sánchez-Díaz, M.; Arias-Santiago, S. Blood Plasma, Fibrinogen or Fibrin Biomaterial for the Manufacturing of Skin Tissue- Engineered Products and Other Dermatological Treatments: A Systematic Review. J. Funct. Biomater. 2025, 16, 79. https:// doi.org/10.3390/jfb16030079
Patrocinador
European Regional Development Fund “A way to make Europe”; Regional Government of Andalusia (PIGE-0242-2019); European Social Fund “Investing in your future”; Instituto de Salud Carlos III through the project PI17/02083, FI18/00269; University of Granada (Spain)Resumen
The use of blood plasma, fibrinogen or fibrin, a natural biomaterial, has been widely studied for the development of different skin tissue-engineered products and other dermatological treatments. This systematic review reports the preclinical and clinical studies which use it alone or combined with other biomaterials and/or cells for the treatment of several dermatological conditions. Following the PRISMA 2020 Guidelines, 147 preclinical studies have revealed that the use of this biomaterial as a wound dressing or as a monolayer (one cell type) skin substitute are the preferred strategies, mainly for the treatment of excisional or surgical wounds. Moreover, blood plasma is mainly used alone although its combination with other biomaterials such as agarose, polyethylene glycol or collagen has also been reported to increase its wound healing potential. However, most of the 17 clinical reviewed evaluated its use for the treatment of severely burned patients as a wound dressing or bilayer (two cell types) skin substitute. Although the number of preclinical studies evaluating the use of blood plasma as a dermatological treatment has increased during the last fifteen years, this has not been correlated with a wide variety of clinical studies. Its safety and wound healing potential have been proved; however, the lack of a standard model and the presence of several approaches have meant that its translation to a clinical environment is still limited. A higher number of clinical studies should be carried out in the coming years to set a standard wound healing strategy for each dermatological disease.





