Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMárquez Ruiz, Ana Belén 
dc.contributor.authorGonzález Herrera, Lucas 
dc.contributor.authorLuna Del Castillo, Juan De Dios 
dc.contributor.authorValenzuela Garach, Aurora 
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-10T13:41:47Z
dc.date.available2025-03-10T13:41:47Z
dc.date.issued2025-01-19
dc.identifier.citationMárquez-Ruiz, A.B., González-Herrera, L., Luna, J. et al. Radiologic assessment of third molar development and cervical vertebral maturation to validate age of majority in a Mexican population. Int J Legal Med (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-025-03450-0es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/102972
dc.descriptionFunding for open access publishing: Universidad de Granada/CBUA. This research was supported by the Andalusian Center of Excellence for Forensic Research (CEIFA, 3193-00), Spain.es_ES
dc.description.abstractAn increase in irregular migration flows has further raised the importance of age estimation in forensic science. To improve the reliability of age of majority determination, one recommendation is to combine the evaluation of third molar development with age-related skeletal information. In the present study, we assessed mandibular third molar development and cervical vertebral maturation to evaluate the ability of these age indicators, alone and in combination, to accurately identify individuals 18 years of age or older. The study sample comprised 123 multi-slice computed tomography images of Mexican individuals (67 males and 56 females) aged between 14 and 22 years. Demirjian’s stages of tooth development and Baccetti’s stages of vertebral maturation were used. A fully developed mandibular third molar (stage H) indicated adult age with 100% certainty. However, around 70% of individuals older than 18 years had third molars that had not yet completed their development. Thus, immature third molars do not rule out the possibility that an individual has reached the age of majority. In the study sample, the combination of the maturity stages of teeth 38 and 48 or their combination with the cervical stages of maturation did not improve upon the prediction accuracy of either of the mandibular third molars alone (area under the ROC curve > 0.85). Therefore, these findings highlight the need to identify other complementary age estimation methods that minimize the number of false negatives (i.e., adults classified as minors) obtained with assessment of third molar development alone.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversidad de Granada/CBUAes_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipAndalusian Center of Excellence for Forensic Research (CEIFA, 3193-00), Spain.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherSpringer Naturees_ES
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectForensic age estimationes_ES
dc.subjectAge of majorityes_ES
dc.subjectThird molares_ES
dc.subjectCervical vertebraees_ES
dc.subjectComputed tomographyes_ES
dc.titleRadiologic assessment of third molar development and cervical vertebral maturation to validate age of majority in a Mexican populationes_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00414-025-03450-0
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES


Files in this item

[PDF]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución 4.0 Internacional
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución 4.0 Internacional