Evaluation of the Sensitivity of the Weather Research and Forecasting Model to Changes in Physical Parameterizations During a Torrential Precipitation Event of the El Niño Costero 2017 in Peru

Abstract

This study evaluates the sensitivity of the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF-ARW) model in its version 4.3.3 during different experiments on a torrential precipitation event associated with the 2017 El Niño Costero in Peru. The results are compared with two reference datasets: precipitation estimations from CHIRPS satellite data and SENAMHI meteorological station values. The event, which had significant economic and social impacts, is simulated using two nested domains with resolutions of 9 km (d01) and 3 km (d02). A total of 22 experiments are conducted, resulting from the combination of two planetary boundary layer (PBL) schemes: Yonsei University (YSU) and Mellor–Yamada–Janjic (MYJ), with five cumulus parameterization schemes: Betts–Miller–Janjic (BMJ), Grell–Devenyi (GD), Grell–Freitas (GF), Kain–Fritsch (KF), and New Tiedtke (NT). Additionally, the effect of turning off cumulus parameterization in the inner domain (d02) or in both (d01 and d02) is explored. The results show that the YSU scheme generally provides better results than the MYJ scheme in detecting the precipitation patterns observed during the event. Furthermore, it is concluded that turning off cumulus parameterization in both domains produces satisfactory results for certain regions when it is combined with the YSU PBL scheme. However, the KF cumulus parameterization is considered the most effective for intense precipitation events in this region, although it tends to overestimate precipitation in high mountain areas. In contrast, for lighter rains, combinations of the YSU PBL scheme with the GD or NT parameterization show a superior performance. It is worth nothing that for all experiments here used, there is a clear underestimation in terms of precipitation, except in high mountain regions, where the model tends to overestimate rainfall.