Time perception in cerebellar and basal ganglia stroke patients
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Antonioni, Annibale; Raho, Emanuela Maria; Capizzi, Mariagrazia; Gozzi, Andrea; Antenucci, Pietro; Casadei, Enrico; Romeo, Zaira; Visalli, Antonino; Gragnaniello, Daniela; Mioni, Giovanna; Pugliatti, MauraEditorial
Springer
Materia
time Implicit timing Explicit timing
Fecha
2025-02-10Referencia bibliográfica
Antonioni, A., Raho, E.M., Capizzi, M. et al. Time perception in cerebellar and basal ganglia stroke patients. Sci Rep 15, 4948 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-89311-7
Patrocinador
(PID2021-128696NA-I00) funded by MICIU/AEI/ 10.13039/501100011033 and ERDF/EU; María Zambrano Fellowship at the University of Granada from the Spanish Ministry of Universities and the European Union NextGenerationResumen
The neural mechanisms underlying time perception remain elusive. Although the cerebellum (CE)
and basal ganglia (BG) are considered fundamental, evidence primarily stems from studies on
neurodegenerative diseases, where progressive and widespread damage complicates linking deficits
to specific brain structures. In contrast, brain stroke affects focal areas suddenly, allowing for the
assessment of immediate functional consequences. Here, we compared patients with acute stroke in
the CE and BG to age-matched healthy controls (HC) on both explicit (time bisection, free and 1-second
finger tapping) and implicit (rhythmic, temporal orienting) timing tasks. Concerning explicit timing,
both CE and BG patients were faster than HC in their free finger tapping, while BG lesions showed
greater variability than HC in the 1-second tapping. Similarly, performance on the bisection task
suggested deficits more related to cognitive complaints in stroke than specific temporal dysfunction.
In implicit timing tasks, BG patients, like HC, effectively used information provided by the rhythm and
the temporal orienting cues to anticipate the target onset, whereas CE patients failed and showed
longer reaction times. Therefore, before compensatory mechanisms can take effect, acute CE damage
might hinder implicit timing, whereas BG lesions could disrupt explicit temporal representation when
processed alongside other cognitive functions.