• español 
    • español
    • English
    • français
  • FacebookPinterestTwitter
  • español
  • English
  • français
Ver ítem 
  •   DIGIBUG Principal
  • 1.-Investigación
  • Departamentos, Grupos de Investigación e Institutos
  • Departamento de Ingeniería Civil
  • DIC - Artículos
  • Ver ítem
  •   DIGIBUG Principal
  • 1.-Investigación
  • Departamentos, Grupos de Investigación e Institutos
  • Departamento de Ingeniería Civil
  • DIC - Artículos
  • Ver ítem
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Wastewater reuse after treatment by MBR. Microfiltration or ultrafiltration?

[PDF] 1-s2.0-S0011916412002573-main.pdf (607.6Kb)
Identificadores
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10481/101852
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2012.05.008
Exportar
RISRefworksMendeleyBibtex
Estadísticas
Ver Estadísticas de uso
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítem
Autor
Arévalo, Juan; Ruiz, Luz Marina; Parada, Julián; González, Daniel; Pérez Pérez, Jorge Ignacio; Moreno Escobar, María Begoña; Gómez Nieto, Miguel Ángel
Editorial
Elsevier
Fecha
2012-08-01
Referencia bibliográfica
J. Arévalo et al. / Desalination 299 (2012) 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2012.05.008
Patrocinador
Andalusian Government (NET 324936/1); European Union funds (FEDER); University of Granada; EMASAGRA; Ministry of Education of Spain (PFPU)
Resumen
Efficiency of two MBR systems (microfiltration and ultrafiltration) at producing reusable effluent was evaluated. The ultrafiltration MBR (0.034 μm pore size) maintained recirculation sludge flow at six times the influent flow, and membranes were backwashed every 5 minutes. The microfiltration MBR (0.4 μm pore size) maintained recirculation sludge flow at four times the influent flow, and membrane-relax was applied after the production phase. Permeates of both systems were shown to be suitable for unrestricted reuse (based on Spanish reuse guidelines); however their colour and aerobic bacteria concentration may lead to their rejection for certain purposes. The capacity of the MBR systems to eliminate organic matter depends on the biological activity in the active sludge, and it is not affected by the type of membrane. The concentration of coliphages is one of the differentiating characteristics between the two systems in terms of the quality of the permeate. This concentration was higher in the microfiltration system, due to the larger pore size, a fact which also explained the higher concentration of aerobic bacteria and the different particle size distribution. Reuse of effluent from ultrafiltration MBR systems is more safety in view of its microbiological and physico-chemical quality.
Colecciones
  • DIC - Artículos

Mi cuenta

AccederRegistro

Listar

Todo DIGIBUGComunidades y ColeccionesPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMateriaFinanciaciónPerfil de autor UGREsta colecciónPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMateriaFinanciación

Estadísticas

Ver Estadísticas de uso

Servicios

Pasos para autoarchivoAyudaLicencias Creative CommonsSHERPA/RoMEODulcinea Biblioteca UniversitariaNos puedes encontrar a través deCondiciones legales

Contacto | Sugerencias