Provisioning challenge: self-consumption versus nestling provisioning, an experimental study.
Identificadores
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10481/101738Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Arco, Laura; Martín-Vivaldi Martínez, Manuel; Peralta Sánchez, Juan Manuel; Juárez García-Pelayo, Natalia; Soler, ManuelEditorial
ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
Materia
Bird ecology Hatching asynchrony central-place forager Nestling provisioning Brood reduction Parental decision
Fecha
2022Referencia bibliográfica
Arco L., Martín-Vivaldi M., Peralta-Sánchez J.M., Juárez García-Pelayo N. & Soler M. (2022) Provisioning challenge: self-consumption versus nestling provisioning, an experimental study. Animal Behaviour 190, 153-65.
Patrocinador
Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation, European funds (FEDER) (CGL2007-61940/BOS, CGL2010-19233-C03-03) and the Junta de Andalucía(P09-RNM-4557). L.A. received a contract of technical support staff from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (Subprogram PTA-MICINN) (Ref. PTA2010-4298-I). Open access charge to University of Granada/CBUA.Resumen
A way of untangling the trade-off between investment in current offspring versus self-maintenance and
future reproductive success is to determine how both parents allocate food between themselves and
their offspring according to food availability. The hoopoe, Upupa epops, is an excellent model to test
hypotheses about these decisions, since it is a central-place forager, a short-lived species and it reproduces
successfully in captivity. We created different conditions of food availability (abundant/scarce)
at two stages of the nestling period and provided different prey qualities in terms of digestibility and/or
size. We hypothesized that parents would prioritize current offspring over their own maintenance. We
predicted that (1) parents would offer their nestlings larger/more digestible prey, while they would eat
smaller/less digestible prey and (2) when food was scarce, parents would not reduce the amount offered
to nestlings. We found that both parents delivered high-quality prey to their nestlings at both stages and
ate prey of lower digestibility in the early stage and smaller prey in the late stage. These results support
the expectations for central-place foragers, as adults delivered the best prey to nestlings. When food
availability was limited, parents at both nestling stages did not reduce the amount of consumed biomass.
Despite nestlings receiving similar biomass in both treatments at the early stage, they experienced a
reduction in biomass at the late stage when food was scarce. Therefore, hoopoes did not follow the
typical strategy of a short-lived species, probably due to energy constraints related to a larger home
range and prolonged nestling periods. In addition, females showed a more flexible response than males
to changes in food availability, especially at the end of the breeding period. These sex-dependent responses
could be related to different parental care investment at this stage when males take care of
fledglings until independence and females are preparing for a second clutch.