Participatory skepticism: Ambivalence and conflict in popular discourses of participatory democracy
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemEditorial
Qualitative Sociology
Materia
Political participation
Fecha
2017Referencia bibliográfica
García-Espín, Patricia, and Ernesto Ganuza. "Participatory skepticism: Ambivalence and conflict in popular discourses of participatory democracy." Qualitative Sociology 40 (2017): 425-446.
Resumen
In recent years researches have focused on the preferences of ordinary citizens
towards democratic deepening, asking: Do people want more institutional participation? The
present work analyzes how different classes of people envisage a participatory democracy and
its problems. Supported by qualitative research based on 16 focus groups conducted in Spain
between 2011 and 2013, it is shown that skepticism plays a central role in the views of
participatory democracy. Doubts surrounding its viability, negative expectations on the responsiveness
of governments and, overall, distrust of the capacities of ordinary citizens,
contribute to skepticism. In some groups these beliefs lead to a rejection of participatory
reforms. In other groups, participants harbor hopes and positive prospects. For them, the key
point is faith in education as a shortcut to political equality.