Human ESCs predisposition to karyotypic instability: Is a matter of culture adaptation or differential vulnerability among hESC lines due to inherent properties?
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Catalina, Puri; Montes, Rosa; Ligero, Gertru; Sánchez, Laura; Cueva, Teresa de la; Bueno, Clara; Leone, Paola E.; Menéndez, PabloEditorial
Springer Nature
Fecha
2008-10-03Referencia bibliográfica
Catalina, P., Montes, R., Ligero, G. et al. Human ESCs predisposition to karyotypic instability: Is a matter of culture adaptation or differential vulnerability among hESC lines due to inherent properties?. Mol Cancer 7, 76 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-4598-7-76
Patrocinador
Junta de Andalucía 0030/2006 to PM, P08-CTS-3678 to PM; International Jose Carreras Foundation against the Leukemia to PM/CB (EDThomas-05); Spanish Ministry of Health (FIS PI070026); ISCIII-FIS (Ref: CP07/00059); ISCIII-CSJAResumen
Background: The use of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) in research is increasing and hESCs hold the
promise for many biological, clinical and toxicological studies. Human ESCs are expected to be chromosomally
stable since karyotypic changes represent a pitfall for potential future applications. Recently, several studies have
analysed the genomic stability of several hESC lines maintained after prolonged in vitro culture but controversial
data has been reported. Here, we prompted to compare the chromosomal stability of three hESC lines
maintained in the same laboratory using identical culture conditions and passaging methods.
Results: Molecular cytogenetic analyses performed in three different hESC lines maintained in parallel in identical
culture conditions revealed significant differences among them in regard to their chromosomal integrity. In
feeders, the HS181, SHEF-1 and SHEF-3 hESC lines were chromosomally stable up to 185 passages using either
mechanical or enzymatic dissection methods. Despite the three hESC lines were maintained under identical
conditions, each hESC line behaved differently upon being transferred to a feeder-free culture system. The two
younger hESC lines, HS181 (71 passages) and SHEF-3 (51 passages) became chromosomally unstable shortly after
being cultured in feeder-free conditions. The HS181 line gained a chromosome 12 by passage 17 and a marker by
passage 21, characterized as a gain of chromosome 20 by SKY. Importantly, the mosaicism for trisomy 12 gradually
increased up to 89% by passage 30, suggesting that this karyotypic abnormality provides a selective advantage.
Similarly, the SHEF-3 line also acquired a trisomy of chromosome 14 as early as passage 10. However, this
karyotypic aberration did not confer selective advantage to the genetically abnormal cells within the bulk culture
and the level of mosaicism for the trisomy 14 remained overtime between 15%–36%. Strikingly, however, a much
older hESC line, SHEF-1, which was maintained for 185 passages in feeders did not undergo any numerical or
structural chromosomal change after 30 passages in feeder-free culture and over 215 passages in total.
Conclusion: These results support the concept that feeder-free conditions may partially contribute to hESC
chromosomal changes but also confirm the hypothesis that regardless of the culture conditions, culture duration
or splitting methods, some hESC lines are inherently more prone than others to karyotypic instability.





