Proposal of a new fidelity measure between computed image quality and observers quality scores accounting for scores variability
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemEditorial
Academic Press Inc Elsevier Science
Materia
STRESS Psycophysics Image quality metric Evaluation
Fecha
2023Referencia bibliográfica
Latorre-Carmona, Pedro, et al. "Proposal of a new fidelity measure between computed image quality and observers quality scores accounting for scores variability." Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation 90 (2023): 103704.
Patrocinador
S. Morillas and R. Huertas acknowledge the support of Generalitat Valenciana under grant AICO-2020-136. R. Huertas acknowledges the support under the research project FIS2017-89258-P (‘‘Ministerio de Economía, Industria 𝑦���� Competitividad’’, ‘‘Agencia Estatal de Investigación’’, Spain) along with the European Union FEDER (European Regional Development Funds) support). M. Pedersen acknowledges the support of the Research Council of Norway through the project ‘‘Quality and Content: understanding the influence of content on subjective and objective image quality assessment’’ (project number 324663).Resumen
Assessment of the visual quality of colour images is usually a difficult process, validated through hard-to-carry-out psychophysical experiments, used to record observer quality scores. Visual image quality metrics aim to maximise the agreement between computed indexes and observer scores, or opinions. Therefore, in this area, it is of critical importance to have appropriate measures of this agreement (i.e. performance) between the computed image quality metric values and observer’s quality scores, both for the development, as well as for the use of image quality metrics. Among the measures of agreement, the most used one nowadays is the well-known Pearson correlation coefficient, while Spearman rank correlation coefficient is also commonly used. The aim of this paper is two-fold. First, to introduce the Standardised Residual Sum of Squares (
) as an alternative metric for the agreement between computed image quality and observers quality scores and analyse its properties and advantages in front of Pearson, Spearman and Kendall correlation coefficients; Second, to introduce a new version of
(called
) that takes observers’ scores variability into account. The results on synthetic and real datasets support that
has a series of benefits in front of the classical approaches and that the inclusion of uncertainty in
has an important effect on the results, quantified by statistical significance tests. A free to download MATLAB code version of
is available at https://viplab.webs.upv.es/resources/