When they become one: awareness of and alternatives to gender binary language in English
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor
Barozzi, StefEditorial
Tirant Humanidades - Tirant Lo Blanch
Fecha
2022Referencia bibliográfica
Barozzi, Stef (2022). When they become one: Awareness of and alternatives to gender binary language in English. En J.R- Guijarro Ojeda y R. Ruiz Cecilia (Eds.), Investigación e innovación en lengua extranjera: Una perspectiva global - Research and innovation in foreign language teaching: A global perspective. Tirant Lo Blanch: 1171-1192
Resumen
This research is based on a project about the use of gender nonbinary and inclusive language
in English that I conducted at the University of Granada in Spain. The main objective
of this study was to demonstrate that students who are exposed to inclusive language
are more likely to show awareness of and to find alternatives to the gender binary system
in the English language. This particular use of the language is not often contemplated
in the English-language classroom (in this case, EFL – English as a Foreign Language),
and is rarely discussed in terms of gender nonbinary identities. The implementation of
inclusive and gender nonbinary language in education is important if we do not want
to discriminate against women and other people who do not fall into the gender binary
system (that is, female or male). My study was mainly inspired by queer theory (Nelson,
2009) and transformative pedagogy (Bedford, 2009). The data were gathered using an
anonymous online survey (Google Form) containing twenty questions, which required
short answers related to the third person singular, such as she, he, they or other alternatives;
including jobs terminology, such as ‘actor’ or ‘firefighters’, and the usage of certain
androcentric expressions, such as ‘mankind’ or ‘man-made’. The corpus under analysis
for this paper was organised into three groups: A) 20 students: 10 undergraduates and
10 studying for an MA, who were exposed to this type of language in my lessons (they
received input); B) 20 students with similar characteristics but without having received
specific input on inclusive and nonbinary language; and C) 20 native speakers of English.
Overall, the results supported my main objective. However, more research is needed to
further corroborate my findings