<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel rdf:about="https://hdl.handle.net/10481/41773">
<title>SEJ069 - Artículos</title>
<link>https://hdl.handle.net/10481/41773</link>
<description/>
<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://hdl.handle.net/10481/58374"/>
</rdf:Seq>
</items>
<dc:date>2026-04-12T06:41:00Z</dc:date>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="https://hdl.handle.net/10481/58374">
<title>Reasoning and Reading in Adults. A New Reasoning Task for Detecting the Visual Impendance Effect</title>
<link>https://hdl.handle.net/10481/58374</link>
<description>Reasoning and Reading in Adults. A New Reasoning Task for Detecting the Visual Impendance Effect
Panagiotidou, Elpida; Serrano Chica, Francisca; Moreno Ríos, Sergio
The visual impedance hypothesis states that at the time of reasoning, the reading context provokes&#13;
visual images, which may add irrelevant details to an inference and thus could hamper reasoning.&#13;
This study aims to create a new visual version of a reasoning task, similar to the traditional propositional&#13;
task of relational syllogisms, but based on visuospatial components. Using such a task, it&#13;
would be possible to investigate the deductive ability of relational inferences in tests without the&#13;
need for reading. Two reasoning tasks were used and measures of working memory, visuospatial&#13;
memory, intelligence, and reading comprehension were taken. The participants were 61 university&#13;
students without reading difficulties. Results show that both versions of the reasoning task work&#13;
similarly in finding the main reasoning effects expected. Findings support the visual impedance effect,&#13;
that is, fewer correct responses in problems with imaginable contents than with neutral ones.&#13;
They indicate that this new visual task could be used to explore reasoning skills without reading&#13;
being involved, and this would be useful for testing reasoning in people both with and without&#13;
reading difficulties.
</description>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
