https://hdl.handle.net/10481/72360 2026-04-26T08:16:55Z 2026-04-26T08:16:55Z Holmqvist, Bosse https://hdl.handle.net/10481/76448 2022-09-20T22:11:23Z

¿Una nueva ciencia? Una lectura crítica de ‘La Méthode’ (1977-1991) de Edgar Morin Holmqvist, Bosse En este artículo el autor expone de manera sintética los contenidos fundamentales y las principales conclusiones de su libro “¿Una nueva ciencia? Una lectura crítica de ‘La Méthode’ de Edgar Morin”. El libro, publicado en sueco, tiene como eje el análisis del proyecto de Morin de una “scienza nuova” basada en un conocimiento del conocimiento, tal y como lo desarrolla en los primeros cuatro volúmenes de “El método”, que eran los que se habían publicado cuando el autor realizó la tesis doctoral de la que el libro es fruto. El autor, desde un enfoque contextualista, critica la ambivalencia en la que, a su juicio, incurren los planteamientos de Morin sobre la cuestión de la relación de la ciencia con los contextos sociales en que se produce y la tendencia de Morin a incurrir en el objetivismo. Relaciona esos planteamientos con el determinismo mecánico que Morin –desacertadamente– atribuye al “sociologismo” y a la sociología del conocimiento.; In this article the author exposes in a synthetic way the fundamental contents and the main conclusions of his book “A new science? A critical reading of Edgar Morin's 'La Méthode' ". The book, published in Swedish, has as its axis the analysis of Morin's project of a "scienza nuova" based on a knowledge of knowledge, as he develops it in the first four volumes of "The Method", which were the ones that were had been published when the author wrote the doctoral thesis from which the book is the fruit. The author, from a contextualist approach, criticizes the ambivalence in which, in his opinion, Morin's approaches incur on the question of the relationship of science with the social contexts in which it occurs and Morin's tendency to incur in the objectivism. He relates these approaches to the mechanical determinism that Morin –unwisely– attributes to “sociologism” and the sociology of knowledge.

Gosselin, Gabriel https://hdl.handle.net/10481/76446 2022-09-20T22:18:16Z

La ciencia según Edgar Morin y la desacralización de la razón Gosselin, Gabriel A partir de un análisis de la crítica que Morin hace a la ciencia cartesiana y del análisis de la “scienza nuova” que propone para sucederla, se examina el concepto de razón cerrada, central en “El método” de Morin, y su explicitación del paradigma de la complejidad. Se quiere mostrar que la clausura de la razón constituye en definitiva una sacralización de la razón, y que este desplazamiento de la problemática es interesante en particular cuando se trata de someter la ciencia a la cuestión ética.; Starting from an analysis of the critique that Morin makes of Cartesian science and the analysis of the "scienza nuova" that he proposes to succeed it, the concept of closed reason, central to Morin's "Method", and its explanation of the complexity paradigm. We want to show that the closure of reason ultimately constitutes a sacralization of reason, and that this displacement of the problem is particularly interesting when it comes to subjecting science to the ethical question.

Rodríguez Zoya, Leonardo https://hdl.handle.net/10481/76252 2022-07-20T10:22:05Z

Pensamiento complejo y democracia. Problematización de los paradigmas liberal y populista Rodríguez Zoya, Leonardo El centenario de Edgar Morin es una oportunidad para pensar el futuro académico y político del pensamiento complejo más allá de la pluma del autor de “El método”. Para este fin proponemos iniciar un diálogo entre el pensamiento complejo y la filosofía política. Nuestro objetivo es problematizar la democracia a partir de un diálogo controversial de la filosofía del pensamiento complejo con la filosofía liberal y la filosofía populista. Este trabajo de problematización permite conceptualizar cinco controversias sobre la democracia: controversias paradigmáticas, controversias histórico-filosóficas, controversias antropológicas, controversias sobre la verdad y controversias sobre la subjetivación y el lazo social. El análisis desarrollado muestra las similitudes y diferencias paradigmáticas entre la racionalidad política liberal y la populista El pensamiento complejo y la antropología de la complejidad humana conceptualizadas por Morin permiten pensar una estrategia teórica y práctica para complejizar la democracia.; Edgar Morin's centennial is an opportunity to think about the academic and political future of complex thinking beyond the writing of the author of “The Method”. To this end, we propose to initiate a dialogue between complex thinking and political philosophy. Our objective is to problematize democracy from a controversial dialogue between the philosophy of complex thinking with liberal philosophy and populist philosophy. This problematization work allows us to conceptualize five controversies about democracy: paradigmatic controversies, historical-philosophical controversies, anthropological controversies, controversies about the truth and controversies about subjectivation and the social bond. Our analysis shows the paradigmatic similarities and differences between liberal and populist political rationality. Complex thinking and the anthropology of human complexity conceptualized by Morin allow us to think of a theoretical and practical strategy to make democracy more complex.

Gembillo, Fabio https://hdl.handle.net/10481/76248 2022-07-20T10:20:54Z

Edgar Morin e l’idea di conoscenza Gembillo, Fabio In questo lavoro l'autore fa un confronto tra la concezione della scienza enunciata dai fisici classici e quella sviluppata da Edgar Morin. Fa notare che gli oppositori con cui Morin litiga sono soprattutto Galilei, Newton e Cartesio. Espone le ragioni per cui il pensatore francese sviluppa un nuovo metodo, con cui opera la svolta dal riduzionismo alla complessità, trasforma il concetto di oggetto statico in quell'evento storico, supera il dualismo soggetto-oggetto e proclama la necessità di un legame inscindibile tra loro. Dichiara che la concezione della complessità rappresenta una vera sfida alla filosofia tradizionale.; In this work, the author makes a comparison between the conception of science enunciated by classical physicists and that developed by Edgar Morin. He points out that the opponents with whom Morin argues are above all Galilei, Newton and Descartes. He expounds the reasons why the French thinker elaborates a new method, with which he operates the turning point from reductionism to complexity, transforms the concept of static object into that historical event, overcomes the subject-object dualism and proclaims the need for an inseparable link between them. Declares that the conception of complexity represents a real challenge to traditional philosophy.

Anselmo, Annamaria https://hdl.handle.net/10481/76003 2022-07-14T07:54:44Z

Edgar Morin, una 'Scienza Nuova' per un nuovo approccio col mondo Anselmo, Annamaria In questo testo l’autore afferma che Edgar Morin mette in evidenza la potenza rivoluzionaria del concetto di Complessità che a livello epistemologico ha favorito l’emergere di una Scienza nuova. Questa scienza supera i principi emersi dall’orizzonte di senso delineato dalla scienza classica e propone in alternativa un nuovo metodo le cui “regole” permettono di cogliere la complessità del reale senza mutilarla e di alimentare la conoscenza anziché soffocarla.; In this work the author states that Edgar Morin highlights the revolutionary power of the concept of Complexity which, at an epistemological level, has favoured the emergence of a new Science. This science goes beyond the principles that emerged from the horizon of meaning outlined by classical science and proposes, as an alternative, a new method whose 'rules' make it possible to grasp the complexity of reality without mutilating it and to nourish knowledge instead of stifling it.