<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>Grupo: La Imagen Barroca del Mundo (HUM188)</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/10481/35432" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/10481/35432</id>
<updated>2026-04-20T15:06:52Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-04-20T15:06:52Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>A critique of the post-neoliberal techno-utopia of transhumanism drawing on Deleuze and Guattari's Philosophy</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/10481/102353" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Alcalá, Francisco J.</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/10481/102353</id>
<updated>2025-02-17T06:50:16Z</updated>
<summary type="text">A critique of the post-neoliberal techno-utopia of transhumanism drawing on Deleuze and Guattari's Philosophy
Alcalá, Francisco J.
In this chapter, I intend to develop a critical study of transhumanism based on the philosophy of Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari. I start from two hypotheses: (i) this philosophy updates Nietzsche’s in the technological aspect since it raises the question of overman concerning the recourse to technology as a technique of enhancement that characterizes the transhumanist movement (Deleuze 1988, 131); (ii) the Deleuzo-Guattarian concept of assemblage is useful to criticize the assumptions, biases and interests present in transhumanism, given the intertwining of the social field with technology that this approach implies. In accordance with the above, this chapter has the following objectives: (i) to elucidate the outlines of a rethinking of philosophical anthropology that responds to the transhumanist challenge, and (ii) to carry out a critique of the cultural assumptions and the socio-political biases and interests present in transhumanism, drawing on Deleuze and Guattari’s concept of assemblage.
</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Thinking the Covid-19 as an Event:  A Physical and Spiritual Illness in the Post-truth Era</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/10481/100624" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Alcalá Rodríguez, Francisco Javier</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/10481/100624</id>
<updated>2025-01-28T07:34:58Z</updated>
<summary type="text">Thinking the Covid-19 as an Event:  A Physical and Spiritual Illness in the Post-truth Era
Alcalá Rodríguez, Francisco Javier
Este trabajo estudia la pandemia de COVID-19 como acontecimiento desde un punto de vista cultural y sociopolítico, sirviéndose de la filosofía de Gilles Deleuze y Félix Guattari. El volumen aparece publicado en la prestigiosa colección Schizoanalytics Applications de la editorial Bloomsbury, una de las fuentes internacionales de referencia en el pensamiento de Deleuze y Guattari en la actualidad.
</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>A pedagogy of generosity: On the topicality of Deleuze and Guattari’s thought in the philosophy of education</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/10481/100613" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Alcalá Rodríguez, Francisco Javier</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/10481/100613</id>
<updated>2025-01-27T13:46:18Z</updated>
<summary type="text">A pedagogy of generosity: On the topicality of Deleuze and Guattari’s thought in the philosophy of education
Alcalá Rodríguez, Francisco Javier
In this article, I will try to elucidate the relevance of Deleuze and Guattari’s approaches in the philosophy of education, along the lines of the Deleuzean pedagogy of ‘do with me’ and the absence of pre-established rules for learning or methodological anarchism. To do so, I will consider three important milestones in Deleuze and Guattari’s thought: (i) antihumanism as the matrix of a pedagogy of generosity, (ii) the primacy of functioning over meaning as a vindication of practical learning versus rote learning, (iii) the concepts of ‘deterritorialisation-reterritorialisation’ as the unlearning required by all true learning.; En este artículo, he tratado de dilucidar la relevancia de los planteamientos de Deleuze y Guattari para la filosofía de la educación, en la línea de la pedagogía deleuzeana del “haz conmigo” y la ausencia de reglas preestablecidas para el aprendizaje o anarquismo metodológico. Para ello, he considerado tres hitos del pensamiento de Deleuze y Guattari: (i) el antihumanismo como matriz de una pedagogía de la generosidad, (ii) la primacía del funcionamiento sobre el significado como reivindicación del aprendizaje significativo (meaningful learning) frente al memorístico, (iii) los conceptos de “desterritorialización-reterritorialización” como el desaprendizaje que requiere todo verdadero aprendizaje. Este es un trabajo importante en el marco de mi producción científica que, desde una perspectiva interdisciplinar que abarca la filosofía, la pedagogía y la psicología educativa, problematiza el aprendizaje y la inteligencia humanas. Al respecto, la tesis general del trabajo consiste en que el aprendizaje genuino es siempre producto de una elaboración creativa y personal de los contenidos y no de un mero procesamiento de la información recibida orientado a reproducirla en el futuro. Correlativamente, sostengo que la generosidad del docente hacia el discente, entendida en sentido cartesiano como puesta entre paréntesis de los intereses individuales a favor de los demás, abre un espacio de intercambio entre iguales que presupone la mayoría de edad intelectual en el educando y abona el terreno para este tipo de aprendizaje, que llamo “significativo” (meaningful learning) siguiendo a psicólogo educativo R. E. Mayer.
</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>The Politicization of the Event in Deleuze’s Thought</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/10481/92438" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Alcalá Rodríguez, Francisco Javier</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/10481/92438</id>
<updated>2024-06-10T06:57:51Z</updated>
<summary type="text">The Politicization of the Event in Deleuze’s Thought
Alcalá Rodríguez, Francisco Javier
This article attempts to elucidate the Deleuzian philosophy of the event between The Logic of Sense and A Thousand Plateaus, where it acquires clearly political nuances. With regard to The Logic of Sense, I show that (i) it takes up the definition of the event of Difference and Repetition, identifying it with that redistribution of pre-individual singularities or individuating differences at the level of the univocal being which defines the conditions of problems; (ii) the event is henceforth also the instance that makes possible the “communication” of the heterogeneous series of bodies and propositions from which the production of sense in language follows; and (iii) the counter-effectuation should be understood in this book as an ethics of the event. With regard to A Thousand Plateaus, I emphasize (i) the “return” to The Logic of Sense that the concept of assemblage entails, (ii) the reformulation of the notion of event that takes place in the new theoretical framework, and (iii) that of the counter-effectuation, which must henceforth be understood as a politics of the event.
</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Mundo, Fortuna y Política en el barroco hispano del siglo XVII</title>
<link href="https://hdl.handle.net/10481/80581" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Gálvez Aguirre, Luis Javier</name>
</author>
<id>https://hdl.handle.net/10481/80581</id>
<updated>2023-03-14T10:01:32Z</updated>
<summary type="text">Mundo, Fortuna y Política en el barroco hispano del siglo XVII
Gálvez Aguirre, Luis Javier
En este artículo se trazarán unas líneas directrices mínimas para&#13;
comprender la relación entre tres conceptos esenciales para la modernidad barroca&#13;
heredera de las tradiciones grecolatinas y cristianas: la fortuna, la providencia y&#13;
la acción ético-política. Si bien la relación entre Fortuna y política ya la podemos encontrar&#13;
en el pensamiento renacentista, las propuestas del barroco hispano, como&#13;
puede ser el caso de Saavedra Fajardo, Juan de Mariana o Baltasar Gracián sirven&#13;
de indicio para barruntar una modernidad alternativa al devenir del uso de tales&#13;
conceptos en la modernidad europea, a saber, en las construcciones filosófico-históricas&#13;
que se inauguran a partir del siglo XVIII. Más concretamente, la consciencia&#13;
graciana de la lógica inmanente de la providencia le forzará a abandonar parcialmente&#13;
ciertos intereses políticos, así como a redefinir el rol del heroísmo dentro del&#13;
esquema barroco de la vanidad del mundo.; This paper will trace the essential guidelines that allow the comprehension&#13;
of the relationship among three reconfigured concepts of the Modern Age&#13;
(which are received from its Greco-Latin and Christian heritage): Fortune, Providence&#13;
and action (in ethical and political terms). Even if this relationship is also&#13;
studied in the Renaissance, the Hispanic Baroque’s proposals (such as Saavedra Fajardo, Juan de Mariana or Baltasar Gracián) let us speculate an alternative Modern&#13;
Age to the one which theorizes the development of Philosophies of History in&#13;
the XVIIIth century. Gracián’s awareness of the immanent logic of providence will&#13;
force him to partially abandon his interests in politics, as well as he must redefine&#13;
the role of heroism in a baroque view that highlights the vanity of this world.
</summary>
</entry>
</feed>
