@misc{10481/94768,
year = {2016},
url = {https://hdl.handle.net/10481/94768},
abstract = {This paper assesses two different approaches to inner speech that can be found in the literature. One of them regards inner speech as a vehicle of conscious thought. The other holds that inner speech is better characterised as an activity derived from social uses of its outer counterpart. In this paper I focus on the explanatory power of each approach to account for the control of attention and behaviour in the context of executive tasks. I will argue that the vehicle view cannot capture some central cases of inner speech in executive tasks because they cannot be described as cases of bringing thought into consciousness. Then I will offer a revised version of the activity view and I will apply it to some examples so as to show that it is better posited to account for them. I end by considering two objections to the activity view and a possible way to address them.},
organization = {Spanish Government 
FFI2011-30074-C01-C02, FPI BES-2012-052157},
publisher = {John Benjamins},
keywords = {Inner Speech},
keywords = {Attention},
keywords = {Activity view},
keywords = {Vehicle view},
keywords = {Executive functions},
title = {Inner Speech in Action},
doi = {10.1075/pc.23.2.02cas},
author = {Fernández Castro, Víctor},
}