@misc{10481/92800,
year = {2021},
url = {https://hdl.handle.net/10481/92800},
abstract = {Organ shortage constitutes an unsolved problem for every country that offers transplantation as a therapeutic option. Besides the largely implemented donation model and the eventually implemented market model, a theorized automatic organ procurement model has raised a rich debate in the legal, medical and bioethical community, since it could show a higher potential to solve organ shortage. In this paper, we study the main arguments for and against this model. We show how, in the light of empirical data extracted from countries with a universal health care system, its implementation could lead to a positive impact on organ procurement rates. Three factors are envisioned as fundamental in the comprehension and a possible regulation of the automatic organ procurement model: the lack of recognition of the conscientious objection, the preservation of the right to choose end of life conditions, and the need to avoid incentives for families or healthcare professionals.},
publisher = {Clinical Ethics},
keywords = {Organ donation},
keywords = {Consent},
keywords = {Ethics},
keywords = {Organ conscription},
keywords = {Donación de órganos, tejidos, etc.},
keywords = {Consentimiento informado (Derecho médico)},
keywords = {Ética médica},
keywords = {Conscripción de órganos},
title = {Addressing organ shortage: An automatic organ procurement model as a proposal},
doi = {10.1177/14777509211011429},
author = {Morla González, Marina and Moya Guillem, Clara and Rodríguez Arias Vailhen, David and de Miguel Beriain, Íñigo and Molina Pérez, Alberto and Ortega-Deballon, Iván},
}