@misc{10481/92023,
year = {2024},
month = {3},
url = {https://hdl.handle.net/10481/92023},
abstract = {Five different design approaches are compared on a single mid-rise reinforced concrete
building, pitting two performance-based designs against three conventional methods in
delivering a solution that satisfies different sets of performance objectives. Two of the conventional
designs stem from the literature, and they represent 2003 IBC compatible solutions.
Another employs the yield point spectra to deliver a code-like solution, satisfying the
design norms without needing iterations. The final two are based on the yield frequency
spectra to offer a design that can satisfy more detailed performance objectives in a single
step. Overall, all five methods are shown to deliver what is expected. Conventional
methods can safely capture the code requirements, yet they are disadvantaged when treading
in beyond-life-safety territory, where Immediate Occupancy or Collapse Prevention
objectives cannot be easily satisfied, a problem that is not shared by performance-based
approaches.},
organization = {Open access funding provided by HEAL-Link Greece},
organization = {Hellenic
Foundation for Research and Innovation (H.F.R.I.) under the “2nd Call for H.F.R.I. Research Projects to
support Faculty Members & Researchers”},
organization = {Project "TwinCity: Climate-Aware Risk and Resilience Assessment
of Urban Areas under Multiple Environmental Stressors via Multi-Tiered Digital City Twinning",
(Grant Number: 2515)},
organization = {Eugenides Foundation
in Greece},
publisher = {Springer Nature},
keywords = {Performance-based earthquake engineering},
keywords = {Uncertainty},
keywords = {Fragility},
title = {Performance‑based versus conventional seismic design: comparative assessment on a 4‑story RC moment frame},
doi = {10.1007/s10518-024-01871-7},
author = {Chatzidaki, Akrivi and Vamvatsikos, Dimitrios and Hernández Montes, Enrique},
}