@misc{10481/91747,
year = {2024},
month = {3},
url = {https://hdl.handle.net/10481/91747},
abstract = {Background: The compliance rate with supportive therapy following peri-implantitis
treatment (SPIT) remains unknown. The present retrospective study was carried out
to assess the compliance rate and the factors influencing compliance in a private
practice setting.
Materials and Methods: Patients were divided into three groups according to
compliance rate: regular compliance (RC ≥2 SPIT/year), erratic compliance (EC <2
SPIT/year), and non-compliance
(NC <1 SPIT/year). Overall, 17 patient-(
n = 8) and
site-related
variables (n = 9) were explored as potential confounders of compliance.
The Chi2 test was applied to assess the association between categorical variables and
determine the odds ratio (OR).
Results: The study comprised 159 patients restored with 1075 implants, of which 469
were treated for peri-implantitis
and met the inclusion criteria. A total of 57.2% were
RC, 25.8% EC, and 17% NC. The multivariate analysis showed that smoking and grade
C periodontitis reduced the likelihood of RC (OR = 0.28, p < .001) when compared to
complete edentulism or non-smoking.
Moreover, age demonstrated being associated
with follow-up
when SPIT was interrupted in EC and NC (OR = 0.94, p = .007).
Conclusion: Comprehensive information, provided prior to peri-implantitis
treatment,
regarding the importance of adhering to SPIT after peri-implantitis
treatment to
achieve/maintain peri-implant
health, resulted in ~60% regular compliance rate
(NCT05772078).},
publisher = {Wiley},
keywords = {Dental implants},
keywords = {Peri-Implantitis},
keywords = {Periodontal disease},
title = {Supportive therapy following peri-implantitis treatment: A retrospective study on compliance},
doi = {10.1111/clr.14257},
author = {Monje, Alberto and Galindo‐Fernandez, Pablo and Nart, José},
}