@misc{10481/87997,
year = {2023},
month = {11},
url = {https://hdl.handle.net/10481/87997},
abstract = {Purpose
This article explores challenges faced by doctoral candidates using grounded theory (GT) in their theses, focusing on coding, theory development and time constraints. It also examines the impact of doctoral committees on GT dissertations, addressing epistemological clashes and the desire for familiarity over novelty.

Design/methodology/approach
Drawing from a multilevel autoethnography and related literature, this study offers pragmatic solutions and strategies for a seamless research journey.

Findings
Coding, theory development and time constraints pose universal challenges, requiring mentorship for effective navigation. Addressing committee dynamics is crucial for developing novel theoretical frameworks.

Originality/value
The article empowers researchers to overcome GT challenges, delving into various positions within the GT paradigm, fostering transparency and facilitating original contributions to their fields.},
organization = {This research is associated with the project YOUNG_ADULLLT, funded by the European Union, Grant Agreement Number 693167.},
publisher = {Emerald Publishing},
keywords = {Grounded theory},
keywords = {Doctoral theses},
keywords = {Qualitative methodology},
keywords = {Coding},
keywords = {Theory development},
title = {Illuminating the path: a methodological exploration of grounded theory in doctoral theses},
doi = {10.1108/QRJ-07-2023-0119},
author = {Guerrero Puerta, Laura and Lorente García, Rocío},
}