@misc{10481/78957,
year = {2022},
month = {11},
url = {https://hdl.handle.net/10481/78957},
abstract = {In Group Decision Making processes, experts debate about how to rank a set of alternatives. It is usual
that, at a certain point of the discussion, the debate gets stuck. In this paper, a novel Group Decision
Making method for environments with a high number of alternatives is presented. Fuzzy Ontologies
are used in order to represent the alternatives and their characteristics. Moreover, a novel stagnation
analysis is used in order to determine if the debate gets stuck. If it does, the method modifies the
alternatives set in order to introduce new options and remove the least popular ones. This way, the
debate can revive since that the new alternatives provide different points of view. The presented method helps experts to conduct long and thorough debates in order for them to be able to make
effective and reliable decisions.},
organization = {MCIN/AEI	PID2019-103880RB-I00},
organization = {FEDER/Junta de Andalucia-Consejeria de Transformacion Economica, Industria, Conocimiento y Universidades	B-TIC-590-UGR20},
organization = {Andalusian government	P20_00673},
organization = {Ministry of Education and King Abdulaziz University, DSR, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia	IFPHI-049-135-2020},
organization = {Universidad de Granada/CBUA},
publisher = {Elsevier},
keywords = {Group decision making},
keywords = {Fuzzy ontologies},
keywords = {Consensus measures},
title = {Introducing disruption on stagnated Group Decision Making processes using Fuzzy Ontologies},
doi = {10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109868},
author = {Morente Molinera, Juan Antonio and Herrera Viedma, Enrique},
}