@misc{10481/71968,
year = {2021},
month = {11},
url = {http://hdl.handle.net/10481/71968},
abstract = {This paper explores an emerging sub-field of both empirical bioethics and experimental
philosophy, which has been called “experimental philosophical bioethics”
(bioxphi). As an empirical discipline, bioxphi adopts the methods of experimental
moral psychology and cognitive science; it does so to make sense of the eliciting
factors and underlying cognitive processes that shape people’s moral judgments,
particularly about real-world matters of bioethical concern. Yet, as a normative discipline
situated within the broader field of bioethics, it also aims to contribute to
substantive ethical questions about what should be done in a given context. What
are some of the ways in which this aim has been pursued? In this paper, we employ
a case study approach to examine and critically evaluate four strategies from the
recent literature by which scholars in bioxphi have leveraged empirical data in the
service of normative arguments.},
publisher = {Springer},
keywords = {Experimental philosophy},
keywords = {Empirical bioethics},
keywords = {Experimental philosophical bioethics},
keywords = {Normative inference},
keywords = {Moral judgment},
title = {Experimental philosophical bioethics and normative inference},
doi = {10.1007/s11017-021-09546-z},
author = {Earp, Brian D. and Rodríguez Hannikainen, Ivar Allan},
}