@misc{10481/67943,
year = {2021},
month = {3},
url = {http://hdl.handle.net/10481/67943},
abstract = {This paper describes the results of a study to compare contemporary e-journal licenses
from two research universities in the United States and Spain in terms of e-reserves,
interlibrary loan, text and data mining, authors’ rights and treatment of copyright
exceptions, usage statistics, governing law, data privacy, and obligations entailing
security. The data include a higher proportion of scholarly society and academic press
publishers than earlier license analyses. This analysis compares license terms over
time, across publisher types and between the two libraries, and it compares findings
with recommendations from model licenses. The results show progress toward model
license goals in some areas, but deficiencies in others including self-archiving, usage
statistics clauses, and clauses related to e-resource data privacy and library security
and disciplinary obligations. Our findings also raise questions about international ILL
and governing venue clauses in library licenses outside the North American context.},
organization = {Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competition 

DER2014-53012-C2-2-R
PRX16/00327},
publisher = {Assoc Coll Research Libraries},
title = {Comparing Use Terms in Spanish and US Research University E-journal Licenses: Recent Trends},
doi = {10.5860/crl.82.2.158},
author = {Fernández Molina, Juan Carlos and Eschenfelder, Kristin R. and Rubel, Alan P.},
}