@misc{10481/54987,
year = {2018},
month = {8},
url = {http://hdl.handle.net/10481/54987},
abstract = {Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) has been considered a reference method for
measuring body fat percentage (BF%) in children and adolescents with an excess of adiposity.
However, given that the DXA technique is impractical for routine field use, there is a need
to investigate other methods that can accurately determine BF%. We studied the accuracy of
bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) technology, including foot-to-foot and hand-to-foot impedance,
and Slaughter skinfold-thickness equations in the measurement of BF%, compared with DXA,
in a population of Latin American children and adolescents with an excess of adiposity. A total of
127 children and adolescents (11–17 years of age; 70% girls) from the HEPAFIT (Exercise Training
and Hepatic Metabolism in Overweight/Obese Adolescent) study were included in the present
work. BF% was measured on the same day using two BIA analysers (Seca® 206, Allers Hamburg,
Germany and Model Tanita® BC-418®, TANITA Corporation, Sportlife Tokyo, Japan), skinfold
measurements (Slaughter equation), and DXA (Hologic Horizon DXA System®, Quirugil, Bogotá,
Columbia). Agreement between measurements was analysed using t-tests, Bland–Altman plots,
and Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (ρc). There was a significant correlation between
DXA and the other BF% measurement methods (r > 0.430). According to paired t-tests, in both
sexes, BF% assessed by BIA analysers or Slaughter equations differ from BF% assessed by DXA
(ρ < 0.001). The lower and upper limits of the differences compared with DXA were 6.3–22.9, 2.2–2.8,
and -3.2–21.3 (95% CI) in boys and 2.3–14.8, 2.4–20.1, and 3.9–18.3 (95% CI) in girls for Seca®
mBCA, Tanita® BC 420MA, and Slaughter equations, respectively. Concordance was poor between
DXA and the other methods of measuring BF% (ρc < 0.5). BIA analysers and Slaughter equations
underestimated BF% measurements compared to DXA, so they are not interchangeable methods for
assessing BF% in Latin American children and adolescents with excess of adiposity.},
organization = {The author C.A.A.S was given a doctoral scholarship from Brazilian government by CAPES
(Coordination of Improvement of Higher Education Personnel) (Proc: 9588-13-2). MM is supported by grants
from the Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture, and Sport FPU14/03329 (predoctoral grant) and EST17/00210
(short stay grant). KG-R received a scholarship from Universidad del Rosario, Colombia, Escuela de Medicina y
Ciencias de la Salud, to do a Doctorate. The HEPAFIT Study was carried out with the financial support of Instituto
Colombiano para el Desarrollo de la Ciencia y la Tecnología “Francisco José de Caldas” COLCIENCIAS (contract
code 59700 and no. 122277757900). The content of this paper reflects the authors’ views alone, and the Colombian
Community and COLCIENCIAS are not liable for any use that may be made of the information contained herein.},
publisher = {MDPI},
keywords = {Adiposity},
keywords = {Body composition},
keywords = {Validation study},
keywords = {DXA},
keywords = {Children},
keywords = {Adolescents},
title = {Comparison of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis, Slaughter Skinfold-Thickness Equations, and Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry for Estimating Body Fat Percentage in Colombian Children and Adolescents with Excess of Adiposity},
author = {González-Ruiz, Katherine and Medrano, María and Correa-Bautista, Jorge Enrique and García-Hermoso, Antonio and Prieto-Benavides, Daniel Humberto and Tordecilla-Sanders, Alejandra and Agostinis-Sobrinho, César and Correa Rodríguez, María and Schmidt Río Valle, Jacqueline and González Jiménez, Emilio and Ramírez-Vélez, Robinson},
}