@misc{10481/108943,
year = {2025},
month = {11},
url = {https://hdl.handle.net/10481/108943},
abstract = {Background: To compare the histological and histomorphometrical outcomes after sinus
floor elevation using an anorganic bovine bone biomaterial or a biphasic calcium phosphate
biomaterial. Material and Methods: Patients who needed maxillary sinus elevation were
included in this study. A total of 68 implant sites were evaluated from a total of 42 patients.
Twenty patients were treated with anorganic bovine bone, while 22 were treated with
biphasic calcium phosphate biomaterial. Morphological and morphometrical studies
were performed on the bone samples collected during implant placement. Results: Both
biomaterials induced similar relative areas of mineralized tissue overall, particularly if only
the area of grafted bone was considered. In turn, a higher proportion of non-mineralized
tissue was observed in cases of biphasic calcium phosphate biomaterial with less area
of remnant biomaterial particles. None of the implants failed at one year of follow-up.
Conclusions: Although both biomaterials induce a similar amount of bone formation, the
histopathological characteristics of the grafts are different, with a greater proportion of scar
connective tissue with the biphasic calcium phosphate biomaterial.},
organization = {Junta de Andalucía (#CTS-138 and #CTS-1028)},
publisher = {MDPI},
keywords = {Sinus floor elevation},
keywords = {Xenograft},
keywords = {Alloplastic material},
title = {Anorganic Bovine Bone vs. Biphasic Calcium Phosphate in a Large Series of Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevations—A Non-Randomized Clinico-Morphological Study},
doi = {10.3390/jcm14238464},
author = {Flichy Fernandez, Antonio and Padial Molina, Miguel and Martín-Morales, Natividad and Alegre-Domingo, Teresa and Peñarrocha Diago, Miguel and O'Valle Ravassa, Francisco Javier and Galindo Moreno, Pablo Antonio},
}